Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis — a Retrospective Cohort Study Based on German Health Claims DATA
Author(s)
Schild M1, Weber V2, Galetzka W3, Enders D3, Zügel FS4, Gothe H2
1Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 2IGES Institut GmbH, Berlin, BE, Germany, 3InGef – Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 4Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany
OBJECTIVES : According to guideline recommendations, systemic therapy is indicated in patients with moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to adequate topical treatment. In addition to extensive health impairment associated with more intense healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), those patients often experience a considerable negative impact on quality of life. Currently, there is a lack of real world evidence on the AD-related medical care situation and economic scope in Germany. The following study analyzed the influence of systemic therapy initiation on HCRU in AD patients with focus on disease-related drug treatment, associated costs and epidemiology. METHODS : This study was conducted in a retrospective cohort design using aggregated pseudonymized German health claims data from the InGef database. A cohort of AD patients with systemic therapy initiation in 2017 was observed over a period of one year before and after initiating systemic treatment, respectively. HCRU and associated costs were analyzed and compared between baseline and observation period. RESULTS : In 2018, the prevalence of AD was 4% (thereof 10% patients with systemic therapy). In the study cohort of patients with index systemic therapy (n=9,975), most patients (>99%) received systemic corticosteroids as index therapy. 96.9% of those discontinued their index systemic therapy (mean time to discontinuation: 46.3 days, SD=58.42). 41.6% received topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) as well. Although use of TCS and/or TCI was less frequent, intensity of drug use was higher in the observation period compared to the baseline period. HCRU was significantly higher after systemic therapy initiation; mainly driven by medication, outpatient services and sick leave. AD patients incurred higher mean annual total costs (3,822€ vs. 3,092€) after systemic therapy initiation. CONCLUSIONS : The study demonstrates a high burden imposed by AD with relevant impact on HCRU and considerable associated costs as well as an unmet need to further improve systemic drug treatment for AD patients.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PSY16
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Public Health, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Drugs, Systemic Disorders/Conditions