COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF DURVALUMAB IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED UNRESECTABLE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AFTER CONCURRENT PLATINUM-BASED CHEMORADIATION IN FRANCE

Author(s)

Tetafort A1, Haug H2, Le Péchoux C3, Chouaid C4, Gherardi A5, Caillon M5, Roze S5, Zang A1
1AstraZeneca, Courbevoie, 75, France, 2AstraZeneca, Courbevoie, France, 3Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, 4Department of Chest Medicine, Créteil University Hospital, Créteil, France, 5HEVA HEOR Sarl, Lyon, France

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab in adult patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours express PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells and whose disease has not progressed after concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation in France.

METHODS: A semi-Markov model adapted to the French setting was used to estimate costs and benefits of durvalumab consolidation versus surveillance on a 10-year time horizon. Parametric functions were fitted to the phase III PACIFIC trial data regarding time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). Health state utilities were estimated from the PACIFIC trial using EQ-5D-5L mapped to EQ-5D-3L to apply French preference scores. Costs (2018) were calculated from a wide payer perspective (collective). Resource use for follow-up and for surveillance were based on expert opinion. All grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (AE) observed in the PACIFIC trial were included with impact on cost and loss of quality of life. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 4%. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed.

RESULTS: Compared to surveillance, durvalumab was associated with a gain of 1.40 (4.54 versus 3.14) life years (LYs) and 1.14 (3.57 versus 2.43) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and an incremental cost of €60,723 driven by treatment costs and prolonged life expectancy in a context of comparison to a non-active treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €43,229/LY and €27,303/LY (-37%) with a 30-year time horizon; the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was €53,332/QALY and €33,961/QALY (-36%) with a 30-year time horizon. Results of the sensitivity analyses showed great robustness of the model and hypotheses.

CONCLUSIONS: The present evaluation suggest that, with a willingness to pay of €100,000/QALY gained, durvalumab consolidation has a 99.4% cost-effectiveness probability compared to surveillance for treating locally advanced unresectable NSCLC after concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation in adults.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PCN145

Disease

Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×