In-Office Versus Operating Room Hysteroscopic Resection of Endometrial Polyps: A Cost Analysis From a Spanish Hospital Perspective

Author(s)

Lobo P1, Alvarez Orozco M2, Mansilla C3
1Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain, 2Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., Madrid, Spain, 3Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., Madrid, Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Hysteroscopic resection represents the standard treatment for endometrial polyps, a common condition diagnosed in 10%-40% of women with abnormal uterine bleeding, as well as in 1%-12% of asymptomatic patients. The procedure can be performed in the operating room; however, technological advancements, such as hysteroscopic morcellation, have enabled the performance of polypectomy in the office setting. This analysis sought to explore the economic implications associated with the introduction of in-office hysteroscopic morcellation (IO-HM) versus hysteroscopic resection with a conventional resectoscope in the operating room (OR-CR) for the treatment of endometrial polyps, from a Spanish hospital perspective.

METHODS: A cost analysis was developed based on previously published evidence on health resource use (HRU) for in-office and operating room hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps, endorsed by a clinical expert. Unit costs, obtained from Spanish sources and expressed in €2024, were applied to estimates of HRU comprising the preanesthetic assessment, surgical procedure and postoperative recovery room stay. The budget impact over a 3-year time horizon, in a hypothetical cohort of 250 patients annually treated and a progressive implementation rate of IO-HM (25%, 50% and 75% the first, second and third year, respectively), and the number of operating room hours released, were also estimated.

RESULTS: Estimated mean total costs were €681.4 and €986.8 per patient undergoing IO-HM and OR-CR, respectively. In comparison to OR-CR, the introduction of IO-HM would result in mean total cost savings of €305.4 per patient, attributed to similar surgical procedure costs (€681.4 IO-HM vs. €671.3 OR-CR), along with the elimination of preanesthetic assessment (-€209.5) and postoperative recovery room stay requirements (-€106.0). Over 3 years, total savings associated with the progressive implementation of IO-HM were estimated at €114,528.6 and 352.5 operating room hours would be released.

CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of IO-HM for treating endometrial polyps could yield substantial cost savings in Spain.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE707

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Medical Devices

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Reproductive & Sexual Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×