Cost-Effectiveness of 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Indian Adults Aged ≥60 Years
Author(s)
Kulkarni N1, Averin A2, Taur S1, Huang L3, Hariharan D2, Atwood M2, Gupta N4
1Pfizer Ltd., Mumbai, India, 2Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Boston, MA, USA, 3Pfizer Inc., Washington Crossing, PA, USA, 4Fortis Memorial Research Institute (FMRI), Gurgaon, India
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: In India, one dose of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) has been recommended for adults aged ≥65 years. For adults ≥60 years at elevated risk (with chronic [“at-risk”] or immunocompromising [“high-risk”] conditions), based on clinical judgement, one dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) followed by PPV23 has been recommended. To simplify the recommendation, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing one dose of PCV13 versus one dose of PPV23 among all Indian adults ≥60 years.
METHODS: Based on current epidemiology, age/risk profile and the expected impact from direct vaccination, a probabilistic cohort model was developed to project lifetime cases, deaths, and medical costs associated with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and all-cause non-bacteremic pneumonia (NBP) (discounting, 5%/year). Cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was assessed from the private/patient and government/payer perspectives, which differed primarily on medical care costs, vaccine price, administration costs, and uptake rates (private/patient: 7.5% among all; government/payer: 7.5%, 15% and 30% among healthy, at-risk, and high-risk, respectively).
RESULTS: Among 145.6 million Indian adults, from the private/patient perspective, replacing PPV23 with PCV13 was estimated to reduce IPD cases by 4,600, all-cause NBP cases by 242,955, and deaths by 9,464. Net costs (including medical and vaccination costs) were estimated to be lower by ₹2.7 billion, thus making PCV13 the dominant strategy. From the government/payer perspective, reductions were 10,640 for IPD, 531,563 for all-cause NBP and 22,199 for deaths. Net costs were estimated to be ₹37.7 billion, yielding a cost/QALY of ₹417,458.
CONCLUSIONS: CEAs suggested that replacing PPV23 with PCV13 among adults aged ≥60 years would be cost-saving from the private/patient perspective and would be cost-effective, depending on the willingness-to-pay threshold, from the government/payer perspective. Considering the burden of pneumococcal disease and the current pneumococcal vaccine coverage, further evaluation of adult pneumococcal vaccination strategies in India is warranted.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE440
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory), Vaccines