Valuing Rare Disease Medicines - We Can Do Better

Published Nov 20, 2013
London, United Kingdom - Many rare diseases, often severe and life-threatening, cannot be treated. The small numbers of patients affected make it time-consuming and costly to compile evidence about treatments. Organisations that pay for health care recognise that a special approach may be needed to guide reimbursement decisions about such treatments. The Office of Health Economics (OHE) and GlaxoSmithKline held three one-day workshops in London during 2012. Participants included patients’ group representatives as well as clinical and health economics experts. The goal was to create and use a framework of weighted criteria to value medicines for rare diseases. This method was a form of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Patients’ group representatives, clinical experts, and health economics experts all gave about half of the weight, that is they based about half of the potential value of rare disease medicines, to attributes reflecting the disease being treated, and half to the effects of the treatment. Patients’ group representatives, however, gave greater weight than the experts to the patient’s quality of daily life and less weight to clinical factors. From this project, the authors conclude that it is feasible for health care payers to value medicines for rare diseases using an explicit framework of attributes, weighted to show their relative importance. This value framework can be created with relevant stakeholders. According to Jon Sussex, Deputy Director of OHE and lead researcher on the study, “The MCDA approach we used proved very much ‘fit for purpose’. We are confident that it can help health care payers and their advisers to capture the information needed for consistent reimbursement decisions that reflect what is most important about new treatments for rare diseases.” The full study, “A Pilot Study of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Valuing Orphan Medicines,” is published in Value in Health.

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

Generative AI Set to Reshape Health Technology Assessment, ISPOR Report Finds

Feb 11, 2025

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of an ISPOR Working Group Report that provides an introduction to the uses of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in health technology assessment (HTA).

ISPOR Tackles Health Disparities with New Research Primer

Jan 22, 2025

ISPOR announced today the publication of a report from the ISPOR Health Equity Research Special Interest Group intended to establish key concepts for conducting health equity research that enables investigators to examine—and ultimately reduce—unfair social inequities in health.

Global Expert Panel Releases Good Practices Guidance for Developing or Updating Health Technology Assessment Guidelines

Jan 14, 2025

ISPOR announced today the publication of a tripartite task force report outlining good practices for developing or updating health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×