Novel Methods for Indirect Comparison of Treatments: When Are They Needed and How Do They Work?

Abstract

Traditional approaches to indirect or mixed comparison of treatments may not always be appropriate or feasible; novel approaches like simulated treatment comparison and matching adjusted indirect comparisons can overcome challenges like heterogeneity in study populations or incomplete or interrupted evidence networks. Traditional approaches to indirect or mixed comparison of treatments may not always be appropriate or feasible; novel approaches like simulated treatment comparison and matching adjusted indirect comparisons can overcome challenges like heterogeneity in study populations or incomplete or interrupted evidence networks.

Authors

K. Jack Ishak Irina Proskorovsky Agnes Benedict Connie Chen

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×