Value in Health
- About the Editors
- For Authors
- Issue Archives
- Editor's Choice
- Viruses and Vaccines
- Budget Impact
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Health Policy
- EQ-5D and Health-Related Quality of Life
- Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
- Personalized Medicine
- Value and Pricing
- Value in Health Regional Issues
- Value & Outcomes Spotlight
- Value in Health
- Advertising & Sponsorship
To project the potential economic impact of pandemic influenza mitigation strategies from a societal perspective in the United States.
We use a stochastic agent-based model to simulate pandemic influenza in the community. We compare 17 strategies: targeted antiviral prophylaxis (TAP) alone and in combination with school closure as well as prevaccination.
In the absence of intervention, we predict a 50% attack rate with an economic impact of $187 per capita as loss to society. Full TAP (FTAP) is the most effective single strategy, reducing number of cases by 54% at the lowest cost to society ($127 per capita). Prevaccination reduces number of cases by 48% and is the second least costly alternative ($140 per capita). Adding school closure to FTAP or prevaccination further improves health outcomes but increases total cost to society by approximately $2700 per capita.
FTAP is an effective and cost-saving measure for mitigating pandemic influenza.
Beate Sander Azhar Nizam Louis P. Garrison Maarten J. Postma M. Elizabeth Halloran Ira M. Longini