Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to compare rabbit-antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine (rATG/CsA) with oxymetholone in terms of direct medical expenditures and economic evaluation in severe acquired aplastic anemia (SAA) and very severe acquired aplastic anemia (vSAA) patients.

Methods

Patients with SAA/vSAA who initiated treatment with rATG/CsA or oxymetholone between 2004 and 2018 were included. Trial-based cost-effectiveness evaluation in healthcare provider perspective was performed. Direct medical costs were retrieved from hospital database, inflated, and converted to 2020 US dollar (30.01 Baht per US dollar). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis by nonparametric bootstrap was performed.

Results

After 2-year follow-up, the total mean (SD) direct medical expenditures per patient for oxymetholone and rATG/CsA group were $8 514.48 ($12 595.67) and $41 070.88 ($22 084.04), respectively. Nevertheless, oxymetholone had significant lower survival rate than rATG/CsA (P=.001) but higher in second-year blood transfusion need (71.4% vs 18.2%) and hospitalization (14.3% vs 0%). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $45 854.08 per life-year gained when rATG/CsA was used instead of oxymetholone (95% CI $24 244.03-$143 496.67 per life-year gained). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that rATG/CsA had no chance of being cost-effective for SAA/vSAA when willingness to pay threshold of one to 3 times of national gross domestic product per capita was applied.

Conclusions

Oxymetholone remains a viable alternative in resource-limited country. Despite its high cost, the rATG/CsA is a preferred treatment option because of the significant advantages on reducing mortality, treatment complications, and hospitalization.