-
Special Interest Groups
- Biosimilars
- Clinical Outcome Assessment
- Digital Health
- Health Preference Research
- Medical Devices and Diagnostics
-
Medication Adherence and Persistence
-
Nutrition Economics
- Oncology
- Open Source Models
- Patient-Centered
- Precision Medicine and Advanced Therapies
- Rare Disease
- Real-World Evidence (RWE)
- Statistical Methods in HEOR
-
Task Forces
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) II
- Joint HTAi - ISPOR Deliberative Processes for HTA
- Machine Learning Methods in HEOR
-
Measurement Comparability Between Modes of Administration of PROMs
- Performance Outcome (PerfO) Assessments
- Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment
- Systematic Reviews with Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Outcomes
- Using Patient Preferences to Inform Decision Making
- Joint ISPE-ISPOR Special Task Force
- Councils & Roundtables
- Global Groups
- Students
-
New Professionals
-
Professional Development Resources
- What is the Impact of GDPR on the HEOR Community
- Good Practices for HTA - What is out there and how do I use it
- ISPOR & AACP Joint Webinar – “Tips for Securing a Post-Doctoral Fellowship”
- You Are Creative: Research is the First Step
- AMCP eDossier System @ FormularyDecisions.com Demo and Practical Application
- Good Practices for a Successful Job Search
- Leveraging The Power Of LinkedIn
- Internships & Fellowships: Career Opportunities for the Future
- My Career Path
- Career Advice Across the Globe
- "My ISPOR Story" - Zeba Khan
- "My ISPOR Story" - Lou Garrison
- Replicate, Regulate, and Redefine: RWE Use Cases in the Next Decade - Session 1
- Replicate, Regulate, and Redefine: RWE Use Cases in the Next Decade - Session 2
- Replicate, Regulate, and Redefine: RWE Use Cases in the Next Decade - Session 3
-
Professional Development Resources
Task Forces develop expert, consensus guidance reports on international good practice standards for health economic and outcomes research and the use of this research in healthcare decision making.
Task Force Review Group
All ISPOR members who are knowledgeable and interested in a task force’s topic are encouraged to participate in a task force review group. This global review group provides valuable feedback on drafts of the report. Reviewer comments are necessary to achieve a thorough, high quality, consensus and multi-stakeholder task force report. Reviewers submitting substantive comments are acknowledged in the report. All task forces are disbanded after their report(s) is published.
"No member of an ISPOR Task Force or Special Interest Group should publish any material from an upcoming report, public presentation or project deliverable without first consulting the larger group for permission prior to submission and publication".
– From the 2018 ISPOR Code Of Ethics