COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE VERSUS OLANZAPINE, QUETIAPINE AND ZIPRAZIDONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA UNDER THE BRAZILIAN PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Nishikawa AM1, Clark OA2, Pititto L3
1Evidências, Campinas, Brazil, 2Evidencias, Campinas, Brazil, 3Janssen Cilag, São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder that requires long-term treatment with antipsychotic medication to minimize relapse and provide benefit to patients. Due to the long duration of treatment, adherence is an important factor in order to avoid relapses and re-hospitalization. Long-acting Injectable (LAI) formulations of atypical antipsychotics provide constant medication delivery and thus a potential improve in adherence. The aim of this analysis is to assess the cost-effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate (PP) relative to olanzapine (OP), quetiapine (QP) and ziprazidone (ZP) under the Brazilian Private Healthcare System perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was developed adopting a monthly cycle length. Patients entered the model according to three different adhesion states related to each treatment drug - fully compliant, partially compliant and non-compliant – and could subsequently transition between different health states during each monthly cycle. Probability of relapse, level of adherence, treatment discontinuation and adverse events associated with each intervention were sourced from literature and while resource use was obtained from specialist’s opinion. Costs and outcomes were evaluated over a 5-year horizon, and discounted at 5.0%. Exchange rate (1 USD = 2.30 BRL) Results were presented as incremental costs/relapses avoided. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed RESULTS: Total costs (USD): PP (15,917), OP (13,670), QP (16,845) and ZP (13,273). Hospitalization relapses costs (USD): PP (3,114), OP (4,504), QP (6,305) and ZP (6,459). Relapses rate: PP (1.15), OP (1.67), QP (2.37) and ZP (2.41). Incremental cost per relapses avoided (USD/relapses avoided): PP vs. OP (2,247), PP vs. QP (-927), PP vs. ZP (2,644).  CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the drugs under analysis, PP demonstrates savings in terms of hospitalization costs. Additionally, PP is a cost-saving strategy compared to QP and when compared to OP and ZP, is a cost-effective therapy for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults patients in Brazil.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PMH50

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×