COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FONDAPARINUX AND ENOXAPARIN IN PATIENTS WITH NON ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Pepe C1, Machado M2, Olimpio A2, Canella M2, Ramos R31MedInsight Evidências, Campinas, SP, Brazil, 2GlaxoSmithKline Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Associated use of antithrombotics, antiplatelets and invasive strategies in patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) reduces cardiovascular events, however, with an increase in the risk of bleeding.  Clinical studies showed that fondaparinux is as effective as enoxaparin in treating patients with NSTE-ACS, but with reduced risk of bleeding events.  The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with NSTE-ACS in Brazil from the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH). METHODS: An analytic decision tree model was conducted to estimate the resultant costs and consequences of the targeted therapies in patients with NSTE-ACS.  Model input data derived from the OASIS-5 study (N=20,078 NSTE-ACS patients randomized to fondaparinux or enoxaparin).  The analyzed outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events (i.e., death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleedings).  Model time horizon was 9, 30, and 180 days post-NSTE-ACS.  Direct costs of NSTE-ACS events and treatments were computed (i.e., drugs, coronary angiography, myocardial revascularization, percutaneous intervention - PCI, hospitalizations, etc.).  Costs were expressed in 2010 Brazilian currency (1BRL=0.59USD).  Univariate and multivariate (Monte Carlo) analyses tested model robustness. RESULTS: At day 9, the average cost per patient treated was 2,575 for fondaparinux and 2,688 for enoxaparin.  Over 65% of total costs were attributed to the invasive treatment (PCI and revascularization). Drug costs (in-hospital therapies) accounted for 10% (fondaparinux) and 12% (enoxaparin) of total costs.  The estimated rates of cardiovascular events were 7.3% and 9.0% for fondaparinux and enoxaparin, respectively.  Results kept unchanged on days 30 and 180 post-NSTE-ACS.  Sensitivity analysis confirmed base-case results. CONCLUSIONS: Fondaparinux was dominant over enoxaparin (lower costs, better long-term benefits).  The budget impact after 5 years of anticoagulant substitution (at 20% constant adoption rate per year) could reach 90 million BRL in savings for the Brazilian MoH and healthcare system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2011-05, ISPOR 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 14, No. 3 (May 2011)

Code

PCV47

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×