Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU) and Costs for Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL): Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T) and Monoclonal Antibodies (MAB) Therapies
Author(s)
Feng C1, Murphy L2, Engel-Nitz N2, Nguyen A3, Patel A1, DuCharme M2, Fu C1, Shah G4
1Kite Pharma, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 3Optum, Apple Valley, MN, USA, 4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
We examined treatment patterns, HRU, and costs for patients receiving CAR-T and/or MABs for R/R LBCL.METHODS:
We calculated: all-cause and non-CAR T-related (i.e., all-cause minus CAR T) HRU and costs for CAR T patients; all-cause HRU and costs for MAB patients. HRU and costs were mean per-patient-per-month during 6-month follow-up. For CAR T and MAB, follow-up started on CAR T infusion and first MAB claim date respectively. The sample comprised adult patients who had: CAR T and/or MAB (7/2017-10/2021); ≥ 90 days continuous enrolment before index; ≥ 1 LBCL diagnosis claim; and no pregnancy.RESULTS:
A total of 195 patients had identified CAR T products: axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) (n=137), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) (n=49), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) (n=9). Axi-cel group had highest proportion of commercially insured patients. Mean Charlson scores were axi-cel=3.8, tisa-cel=4.0, and liso-cel=2.4. Median days from leukapheresis to CAR T infusion (n=126): axi-cel=26.0, tisa-cel=35.0, and liso-cel= 37.0. Number of all-cause (non-CAR T) ambulatory visits: axi-cel=9.73 (9.63), tisa-cel=11.76 (11.48), liso-cel= 13.60 (13.22). Number of all-cause (non-CAR T) inpatient (IP) days: axi-cel=5.91 (1.86), tisa-cel=5.41 (2.01), liso-cel=2.73 (0.22). Total all-cause (non-CAR T) costs: axi-cel= $133,139 ($24,012), tisa-cel=$101,946 ($33,276), liso-cel=$127,567 ($77,850); all-cause (non-CAR T) ambulatory cost: axi-cel=$15,995 ($12,619), tisa-cel=$24,185 ($23,869), liso-cel=$76,693 ($76,622); all-cause (non-CAR T) IP stays costs: axi-cel=$96,855 ($8,110), tisa-cel=$70,915 ($7,181), liso-cel=$50,121 ($475). During the study period, 28.7% and 8.9% of Pola (n=188) and Tafa (n=56) received CAR T. In the MAB groups, number of all-cause (including MABs) ambulatory visits were: polatuzumab vedotin-piiq (pola)=8.7, tafasitumab-cxix (tafa)=9.4; IP days: pola=2.24, tafa=2.25; and all-cause costs: pola=$49,792, tafa=$25,978. Subgroup and multivariable analyses will be presented.CONCLUSIONS:
Time from leukapheresis to infusion was shortest for axi-cel. Compared with other CAR T products, axi-cel had higher all-cause but lower non-CAR T costs. MAB use was common among CAR T patients, with substantial HRU and cost impact.Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
RWD178
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Oncology