Outcomes Examined in Clinical Trials of Medicines for COVID-19: A Review of Regulatory Agencies' Websites

Author(s)

Rojas P1, Epp C2, Gozzo L3, Geba D4, Epstein M5, Michel S6
1University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain, 2Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Catania, solarino, Italy, 4Ascenian Consulting, Rochester, NY, USA, 5Ascenian Consulting, Webster, NY, USA, 6Ascenian Consulting, Berlin, Germany

OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to over 250 million cases and 5 million deaths worldwide. Despite limited understanding of disease pathogenesis and pathophysiology, clinical trials have been conducted since early 2020 to evaluate vaccines and treatments. This research aims to identify outcomes examined in clinical trials of COVID-19 medicines developed on an accelerated timeline.

METHODS: Appraisal reports for medicines for COVID-19 publicly available by December 15, 2021, were identified on the websites of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), vaccine committees, and health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Searches for clinical and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes were conducted in all reports. Searches for health economics (HE) outcomes were limited to the HTA reports.

RESULTS: Information on clinical trial outcomes was retrieved for all EMA-authorized medicines [four vaccines (Comirnaty®, SpikeVax®, Vaxzevria®, and COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen®) and three treatments (Veklury® and two monoclonal antibodies)], and for six out of 11 medicines under EMA review. The primary outcomes examined in vaccine trials pertained to vaccine efficacy (i.e., reduction of number of symptomatic cases). For treatments, the primary and secondary outcomes varied by study and pertained mostly to disease progression (e.g., hospitalization), time to hospital discharge, all-cause mortality, sides effects, and change in viral load. No HRQoL or HE outcomes were reported in any vaccine committee or HTA reports identified.

CONCLUSION Outcomes investigated in clinical trials and published in the EMA, vaccine committees, and HTA reports are in line with requirements for treatments addressing public health threats. HRQoL and HE may become relevant in the medium- to long-term, when the treatment context of a pandemic situation turns to an endemic context with multiple treatment options in the same position. At that point, HRQoL and HE data – which are currently missing – may become critical in decision making.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

HTA66

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×