Treatment Response and Disease Burden of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan
Author(s)
Tang CH1, Li KJ2, Liao CY3, Chuang PY4, Furnback W5, Wang B6, Kim S7
1Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Astellas Pharma Taiwan, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, 4Real Chemistry Inc., Whitestone, NY, USA, 5Real Chemistry Inc., Brick, NJ, USA, 6Real Chemistry Inc., New York, NY, USA, 7Astellas Pharma Singapore Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
Presentation Documents
Objectives: To evaluate treatment response, healthcare resource utilization, and direct costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or biologics in Taiwan. Methods: A retrospective observational study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2018 was conducted. Two mutually exclusive RA cohorts, incident csDMARDs users and incident biologic users, were identified and enrolled upon their first claim for a csDMARD or a biologic, in 2016, respectively. Response (stable or inadequate response [IR]) to csDMARDs and biologics was measured using a validated claims-based algorithm in the one-year after initiation. Healthcare resource utilization and direct costs (NT$) were for up to two years post enrollment. Results: There were 7,570 and 1,770 RA patients newly initiating a csDMARD or biologic in 2016, respectively. After one-year, 28.4% and 70.1% of csDMARD initiators and 55.4% and 42.9% of biologic initiators were classified as stable or IR, respectively. RA-related hospital admissions, hospital days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits were all significantly (p<0.01) higher for patients with IR compared to stable response in csDMARD initiators. Biologic initiators with IR had significantly higher (p<0.001) RA-related hospital admission and hospital days compared to stable response. Patients with a stable response had lower mean total direct costs than IR in both the csDMARD (NT$54,276 vs. NT$63,163; p=0.0346) and biologic cohorts (NT$392,279 vs. NT$409,408; p=0.0174). Total direct costs rose an average of 25.8% (driven by a 79.6% increase in medication costs) from year one to year two for csDMARD IR patients, compared to a 0.9% increase for stable patients. Conclusions: RA patients initiating their first csDMARD or biologic and achieving a stable response demonstrated lower healthcare resource utilization and costs, compared to those with an inadequate response.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
RWD94
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Disease
Biologics and Biosimilars, Drugs, Systemic Disorders/Conditions