Higher Work Impairment and Increased Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Crohn's Perianal Fistula: Results from a Global Burden of Illness Study

Author(s)

Karki C1, Geransar P2, Hantsbarger G1, Lee K3, Perovic M4, Raven L5, Sajak-Szczerba M4, Sharpe E6, Silber A6, Tozer P7
1Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland, 3Crohn's & Colitis Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4European Federation of Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Associations, Brussels, Belgium, 5Crohn's & Colitis Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 6Trinity Partners, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA, 7St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: Perianal fistulas (PF) are a common complication of Crohn’s disease (CD), and patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas (CPF) often have a greater burden of illness than patients with CD without PF. This study assessed the impact of PF on work productivity and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with CD with and without PF.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Spain and UK, in patients aged ≥ 21 and ≤ 90 years with self-reported physician-diagnosed CD. Three patient cohorts were assessed: non-PF CD (C1); CPF without PF-related surgery (C2); and CPF with PF-related surgery (C3). Patient data were collected using a 45-minute IRB/EC-approved web-enabled questionnaire. Work productivity was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Crohn’s Disease Scale (WPAI:CD). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS: Of 929 patients recruited (C1, n = 620; C2, n = 174; C3, n = 135), overall, 58%, 67% and 69% were male and 55%, 64% and 67% were aged 21–40 years in C1, C2 and C3, respectively. Patients with CPF had significantly higher (more impaired) WPAI-CD scores across all domains than patients without CPF: 21% vs 15% for ‘worktime missed’ (for patients currently working); 54% vs 39% for ‘impairment while working’ and 61% vs 45% for ‘overall work impairment’ (for patients who worked in the past 7 days); and 57% vs 45% for ‘impairment due to CD’ (for all patients), respectively (all p < 0.001). The number (mean [standard deviation]) of emergency room visits and inpatient stays was significantly higher for patients with CPF than those without CPF (2.1 [2.5] vs 1.5 [3.5] and 1.8 [2.6] vs 1.0 [2.1], respectively; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with CPF have a significantly higher work activity impairment and HCRU than patients without CPF.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE215

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×