Characteristics of Real-world Commercially Insured Patients with Treatment-resistant Depression Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Conventional Therapies

Author(s)

Karkare S1, Zhdanava M2, Nash A1, Pilon D2, Morrison L2, Shah A2, Lefebvre P2, Joshi K1
1Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: To characterize patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) initiating esketamine or conventional therapies.

METHODS: Adults with a Major Depressive Disorder diagnosis were selected from the MarketScan® Databases (01/2010-07/2020). A claims-based algorithm identified TRD as the initiation of a new antidepressant therapy after 2 different lines of adequate dose and duration during the most recent major depressive episode. Patients with observed evidence of TRD receiving treatment on/after 03/05/2019 (esketamine approval date) were then classified in the esketamine cohort if they initiated esketamine (index date), or conventional therapies cohort if they newly initiated electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or pharmacological therapies (index date was the therapy initiation date, prioritizing ECT, then TMS). Patient characteristics were described over 6-months pre-index.

RESULTS: Esketamine cohort included 246 patients (mean age 46.5 years, 63.0% female) and conventional therapies cohort included 104,164 patients (mean age 46.9 years, 74.8% female; 0.4% initiating ECT, 1.2% TMS). In esketamine and conventional therapies cohorts, 82.9% and 34.2% had a visit with psychiatrist, 77.6% and 41.4% received psychotherapy pre-index, respectively. Among those with outpatient care for MDD (esketamine: 91.9%; conventional therapies: 63.6%), 62.4% and 33.0% received it in a specialized mental-health care setting. In esketamine and conventional therapies cohorts, 34.6% and 17.6% received ≥3 unique antidepressants, 65.4% and 56.4% received antidepressant augmentation therapy. Mean monthly healthcare costs pre-index were $2,532 in esketamine and $1,873 in conventional therapies cohort, driven by outpatient costs (esketamine: $1,077; conventional therapies: $734) and pharmacy costs (esketamine: $688; conventional therapies: $468). In esketamine and conventional therapies cohorts, 58.2% and 32.4% of costs were mental-health related. Suicidal ideation or behavior was observed in 8.5% and 3.6% of esketamine and conventional therapies cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with TRD, those initiating esketamine relative to conventional therapies, appear more severe, use more mental-health care and medications, and have higher costs before therapy initiation.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PMH30

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Hospital and Clinical Practices, Prescribing Behavior, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Mental Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×