Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Use for Patients -65 Years with Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Author(s)

Glover S1, Ray G2, Borrego M3, Roberts M4
1University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 3The University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 4The University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Sodium Glucose Transporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Diabetes guidelines recommend SGLT-2i therapy for HFrEF patients, however, SGLT-2i cost is a concern. We conducted a one-year cost-benefit analysis by modeling the use of SGLT-2i in reducing HF hospitalization in a < 65-year-old U.S. commercially insured population with T2D and HFrEF.

METHODS: Economic models included HF hospitalization rates from real-world data (RWD) and rate reductions from RWD and three SGLT-2i clinical trials. Real-world HF hospitalization rates by age group for patients with/without an SGLT-2i were obtained from Truven Commercial Database using claims data for U.S. patients with T2D and HFrEF with a prescription for metformin from 2012-2018. Perspectives were health-care sector and societal (productivity losses from hospitalization/ post-discharge recuperation/mortality). Sensitivity analyses considered 50% reductions in mortality rate and SGLT-2i prescription cost estimates.

RESULTS: Real-world HF rate reductions (by age group: 18-29/100%; 30-44/ 20.7%; 45-54/ 49.1%; 55-64/ 19.7%; overall/ 30.1%) varied, but were similar to trials (35%-49.0%). Mortality assumption was 22%. Calculated benefit-cost ratios were: health-care sector, RWD=0.26 vs trials=0.28-0.37; societal, RWD=2.23 vs trials=2.18-2.91. Greatest benefit-cost ratios were for 18-29 (health-care: RWD, 1.65, trials 0.60-0.80; societal: RWD 23.90, trials 8.43-11.21) and lowest for 55-64 (health-care: RWD, 0.16, trials 0.27-0.35; societal: RWD 0.89, trials 1.42-1.88). Reducing mortality assumption reduced societal benefit-cost ratios (RWD 1.46, trials 136-1.82). Reducing SGLT-2i cost 50% increased health-care benefit-cost ratios (RWD 0.52, trials 0.57-0.74); reducing SGLT-2i cost 72% generated positive trial ratios.

CONCLUSIONS: Societal benefits are substantive; health sector benefits are negative unless SGLT-2i cost is drastically reduced. SGLT-2i protective role in the setting of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease were not modeled in this analysis; inclusion of these benefits would likely increase SGLT-2i benefits.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PMU12

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Multiple Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×