Guideline for Health Economic Evaluation of Medicines: A Proposal by the Advisory Committee for Financing Pharmaceutical Benefits (CAPF) in the Spanish National Health System

Author(s)

Trapero M1, Oliva-Moreno J2, Catalá-López F3, García-Pérez L4, Segú JL5, Alegre E6, Clopés A7, Lobo F8, Ortega A9, Puig-Junoy J10
1Universitat de Lleida, Barcelona, B, Spain, 2University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain, 3Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 4Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 5Pharmalex, BARCELONA, Spain, 6University Hospital of Puerto Real, Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain, 7Catalan Health Service (CatSalut), Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 8Universidad Carlos III, Getafe (Madrid), Spain, 9Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Pamplona, Spain, 10Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Previous health economic evaluation guidelines have been developed in Spain, but in 2023 the Ministry of Health's Pharmacy General Directorate commissioned a guidance document primarily intended for medicines evaluation. The objective of this methodological note is to present the official English translation of the commissioned guideline for health economic evaluation of medicines proposed by the Advisory Committee for the Financing of Pharmaceutical Benefits of the National Health System (“Comité Asesor de la Prestación Farmacéutica del SNS” [CAPF]).

METHODS: The development process involved a review of previous Spanish guidelines on the subject, as well as selected international guidelines primarily from Australia, Canada, the United States, England and Wales, France, and Portugal, with a focus on the latter two. Additionally, the CHEERS 2022 statement and the EUnetHTA Guideline were considered

RESULTS: This guideline includes 17 dimensions that an economic evaluation of medicines must encompass, designing a base case, and defining a checklist for evaluating the methodological quality and reporting. This guideline should serve as a foundational document for reforming the health technologies evaluation processes of the Ministry of Health. The guideline can also assist researchers, public health professionals, health technology companies and decision makers in assessing the validity of findings and conclusions from health economic evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS: The proposed health economic guideline represents an essential tool for health services seeking to optimize the allocation of resources, promoting interventions with the best cost-effectiveness ratio, improving the quality of care, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the system.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

HPR27

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways, Insurance Systems & National Health Care, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Drugs, Medical Devices

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×