A Review of Health Technology Assessments Conducted for Tumor Agnostic Therapies Across the UK and EU4

Author(s)

Mackley R1, Teague R2
1Maverex, Newcastle, NT, UK, 2Maverex, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NBL, UK

OBJECTIVES: Tumour agnostic therapies treat a variety of cancers by targeting a specific genomic feature, regardless of tumour type or location. Two tumour agnostic therapies are regulatory approved in Europe: larotrectinib and entrectinib, both for neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive solid tumours. This study reviewed health technology assessments (HTAs) conducted for larotrectinib and entrectinib across the EU4 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain) and the UK (England, Scotland).

METHODS: A targeted review of HTA agency websites was conducted on the 12th April 2024 to identify HTA documentation. The reimbursement outcome, clinical and economic evidence and the HTA body evaluation of the submitted evidence were analysed.

RESULTS: Across the six countries, 11 HTAs were identified (5 larotrectinib, 6 entrectinib). Reimbursement outcomes were positive in 91% of assessments (10/11; 5 non-conditional and non-restrictive [Scotland, Germany and Italy], 4 conditional and non-restrictive [England and Spain], 1 restricted and conditional [France - larotrectinib]) and negative in 9% (1/11 [France – entrectinib]). Key drivers of conditional outcomes included the absence of a trial comparator, immature trial survival data, and because the trial population was not generalisable to clinical practice. Analyses to derive a synthetic comparator arm were submitted in 45% (5/11) of assessments. In 60% (3/5 [France and Germany]) of these assessments, the HTA agency stated they couldn’t assess comparative efficacy due to methodological limitations of the analyses. Where required, a single cost-utility analysis model generating a pooled incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) across tumour types was submitted (27% [3/11] of assessments). A pooled analysis was accepted in Scotland, while the HTA agency in England stated that the appropriate model structure was uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS: While reimbursement outcomes were predominantly positive, variations in assessment criteria lead to disparities in evidence acceptance and reimbursement outcomes between HTA . Adapted HTA frameworks are required for tumour agnostic therapies to ensure broad and timely patient access.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

HTA61

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×