Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Case Study on Its Potential Prospects in HTA
Author(s)
Soboil J, Morris J
Cogentia Healthcare Consulting, Cambridge, CAM, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
Principle 9 of NICE’s charter aims to reduce health inequalities. NICE therefore considers health inequality to be an important factor in decision-making. Current approaches to valuing health inequalities in HTA decisions are, generally, unsystematic and thus untransparent. However, Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) provides a systematic approach to valuing health inequalities. The aim of this study is to therefore develop a DCEA case-study to explore the prospects of DCEA in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).METHODS:
DCEA reweights standard cost-effectiveness outcomes, specifically incremental QALYs and costs, based on a decision-maker’s aversion to inequality and the pre-intervention health inequalities that exist within a general population. Since Hepatitis C disproportionately affects more deprived socio-economic groups within England, we use Hepatitis C as a case study. We derive incremental QALYs (1.24) and costs (£20,661) from NICE TA507 (Vosevi vs. Pegylated interferon alpha 2a), which reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £16,654. From these data, we analyse the health equity impact of Vosevi within the chronic Hepatitis-C DAA-naive population of England.RESULTS:
Based on an aversion to inequality value of 11, the DCEA-weighted ICER reduces to £13,177 (a 21% reduction), with large concomitant gains in net health benefit (NHB). A Slope Index of Inequality (SII) regression (SII = -21,262) indicates the intervention reduces overall health inequality. However, since the majority of eligible patients (56%) fall within the most deprived socio-economic groups of England, a scenario analysis was performed where proportions of patients across deprivation quintiles were equal (20% per quintile). In this scenario, both health inequality (SII = 224) and the ICER increase (£24,194), while gains in NHB are minimal.CONCLUSIONS:
By providing quantitative estimates on both equity and efficiency of an intervention, DCEA enables a standardised and systematic approach for industry and HTA agencies to value how a medical product may affect health inequalities.Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE733
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Health Disparities & Equity, Novel & Social Elements of Value
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Drugs, Medical Devices, Vaccines