Cost-Effectiveness of Meningococcal B Vaccination in the Netherlands
Author(s)
Zeevat F1, Joost S2, Westra TA3, Wilschut JC4, van Sorge N5, Boersma C6, Postma MJ4
1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands, 2GSK, Amersfoort, UT, Netherlands, 3GSK, Amersfoort, Netherlands, 4University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 5Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 6Health-Ecore, Zeist, UT, Netherlands
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a severe and unpredictable disease, causing acute meningitis and sepsis, which are associated with high mortality and long-term consequences. A national immunization programme to prevent IMD caused by meningococcal serogroups A, C, W and Y has been introduced in the Netherlands. This study aimed to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of introducing the protein-subunit-meningococcal-B-vaccine (4CMenB) to prevent IMD caused by Meningococcal B by using a dynamic transmission-based cost-effectiveness (DyCE) model.METHODS:
The DyCE model was used to simulate the future overall incidence of Meningococcal B, based on 2010-2019 incidence data. In the base case, 50 cohorts of young children were vaccinated and followed over lifetime (100 years). Compared to a previously published study in 2013, the current analysis included an improved estimation of the long-term IMD complications, new data regarding vaccine effectiveness and an optimized vaccination schedule. We estimated the ICER in different scenarios where the vaccine price and number of cohorts vaccinated were varied. Also, the incidence was varied to assess the impact of a potential outbreak in the future.RESULTS:
The ICER for the base-case analysis was estimated to be €105,525 per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) gained, with a vaccine price of €78.50, 50 cohorts being vaccinated and an average, relatively low, incidence from 2010 to 2019. When excluding mental health sequelae in the model, the ICER increased to €131,940. When varying the incidence to levels seen in 1990-1999 (x5) or 2000-2009 (x3), the ICER became more favourable and potentially cost-effective against a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000 per QALY gained. Combining this with a potentially reduced vaccine price would further promote favourable ICER values.CONCLUSIONS:
Introducing 4CMenB could be cost-effective in the Netherlands when different scenarios of an increased incidence and/or a reduced vaccine price are assumed.Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE617
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
STA: Vaccines