Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab From a German Statutory Health Insurance Perspective

Author(s)

Schwander B1, Klesper K2, Rossol S3, Herrmann K4, Zoellner YF5
1AHEAD GmbH, Bietigheim-Bissingen, BW, Germany, 2Kolbe Health Communications, Meerbusch, Germany, 3Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt a.M., Germany, 4Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany, 5ECON-EPI, Wentorf/Hamburg, Germany

OBJECTIVES: Non-metastasized, non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stages B and, in part, C (≈25%) can be treated by systemic immunotherapy or selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Therapies vary in terms of required infrastructure, medical specialization(s), facilities, preparation, conduct, and cost. Our objective was to undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and budget impact analysis (BIA) of SIRT – here: with 90Y-labelled glass microspheres (TheraSphere®) compared to immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) – from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI).

METHODS: A CEA and BIA model was developed in MS Excel. Clinical and cost inputs were sourced from published literature and official databases. The available key studies (IMbrave150 and DOSISPHERE-01) suggest that both strategies are potentially comparable in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in HCC, but a difference in adverse events in favor of SIRT was observed. Accordingly, the CEA model investigates the endpoint “cost per adverse event avoided” and the BIA estimates the impact of shifting current market share to the more cost-effective option. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to account for uncertainty.

RESULTS: The model computed mean annual per-patient costs of €23,001 undergoing SIRT compared to €86,762 for A+B. As SIRT featured a lower number of adverse events compared to A+B, it was the dominant strategy. The market share of SIRT in eligible HCC patients is currently about 25% (n≈500 procedures/year) in Germany. Switching another 25% of eligible patients from systemic therapy to SIRT could hence generate annual savings of approx. €30.7 million to the SHI system. The results were robust in sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Comparing systemic immunotherapy and personalized radioembolization in the indicated HCC target group, SIRT appears to be the dominating strategy with the potential to generate cost-savings from a German SHI perspective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE566

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

SDC: Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×