Informal Carer Disutility: How Many Caregivers Are Captured in Cost-Utility Analyses of Treatments for Rare Diseases Submitted for NICE Highly Specialised Technology Appraisals?
Author(s)
Tolley K1, Russell M2, Noble-Longster J1, Ryder S1
1Tolley Health Economics Ltd, Buxton, DBY, Great Britain, 2Tolley Health Economics Ltd, Buxton, DBY, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The latest National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) health technology assessment (HTA) methods permit the inclusion of caregiver disutility data, where appropriate, in technology appraisals. In the context of rare diseases, the impact on the health-related quality of life of a patients’ parents, partner, and other family members can be substantial. This research reviewed how carer disutility and the number of impacted carers have been considered within previous NICE highly specialised technology (HST) appraisals.
METHODS: NICE HST appraisals published until June 2022 were reviewed and those where caregiver disutility was contained within the submission were included. Information extracted included the number of caregivers incorporated into the economic model (reported here) as well as: disutility value(s) applied, source of data, and the NICE critique of the methods used.
RESULTS:
As of June 2022, there were 19 NICE HST appraisals reported on the NICE website, 15 of which attempted to account for caregiver disutility in the economic analyses. The number of caregivers for which disutility values were applied in the models ranged between 0.06 and 3, with heterogeneity in how disutilities were calculated and applied in the model. As examples, HST20 used 1.4 caregivers based on using the average UK household size minus 1 for the patient, whereas HST11 used 1.78 caregivers, the mean numbers of parents in a household. Other appraisals used a Delphi Panel (HST12) or a caregiver burden survey (HST14) to elicit number of caregivers.CONCLUSIONS: This initial research demonstrates variability in practice and uncertainty around best practice for incorporating carer disutility into cost-effectiveness analyses of new treatments for rare diseases appraised in NICE HST appraisals. Future appraisals would benefit from a focus on the best methods to implement when considering informal carer disutility data, and learnings from previous HTAs will likely help to inform this.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
HTA260
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Health State Utilities, Surveys & Expert Panels
Disease
SDC: Rare & Orphan Diseases