Project Ideate: Designing a Robust Methodology for an Experimental, Retrospective Outcome-Based Agreement in a Breast Cancer Treatment

Author(s)

Burton J1, Sloan R2, Halsby K3, Sainz de la Fuente G4, John G5, Selby J5, Warburton A5, Clifton-Brown E3, Laing H6, Bale C7, Davies M8, Chowdhury M3, Porter T9, Pearson-Stuttard J10
1Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, SRY, UK, 2Lane Clark & Peacock, Winchester, HAM, UK, 3Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, UK, 4Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK, 5Digital Health & Care Wales, Cardiff, UK, 6Swansea University, Swansea, NTL, UK, 7NHS Wales-Betsi Cadwaladr University Heath Board, Bangor, UK, 8NHS Wales- Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Heath Board, Swansea, UK, 9Lane Clark & Peacock, London, LON, UK, 10Lane Clark & Peacock, London, UK

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

Outcome-based agreements (OBAs) have the potential to align incentives of payers and providers of therapeutics around patient and population health. Many barriers prevent their routine implementation, including contract design, data challenges, administrative burden, and the benefits/risks perceived by payers. We aimed to co-create a robust, systematic methodology for OBA design in partnership with the Welsh healthcare system to overcome existing barriers and succeed in a real-world setting.

METHODS:

IDEATE developed a methodology for OBA design focused on improving patient health outcomes. We facilitated workshops for outcomes, data, and contract design with a range of stakeholders including clinicians, pharmacists, commissioners, and data experts to build consensus on key parameters for the experimental OBA, including priority clinical outcomes. In parallel, we created a novel linked real world data environment for the analysis.

RESULTS:

Our iterative OBA methodology drives consensus-building across diverse stakeholders and successfully navigates many barriers of real-world implementation. Steps include: Assess medicine feasibility for OBA, Define the eligible population and outcomes for inclusion; Define how each outcome is measured and any sub-populations requiring separate measurements; Determine the outcome benchmark and metric used to assess performance; Define how the metrics are aggregated across strata and outcomes; Agree direction of payment flows from provider to payer; Define the term of the agreement and the period outcomes are assessed; Define proportion of payment that is subject to OBA outcomes; Define the formula to convert the performance metric into payment; and Agree provisions for contract parameter updates during the agreement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Trust and transparency proved key for effective collaboration and dynamic problem-solving. System readiness in Wales highlighted a unique environment to solve OBA barriers. Our cross-disciplinary and cross-organizational methodology is generalisable to a range of health interventions. Understanding cash flow across multiple years’ budgets needs additional research for a successful OBA.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

CO108

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Health Policy & Regulatory, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Performance-based Outcomes, Risk-sharing Approaches

Disease

STA: Drugs

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×