Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Other CAR T-Cell Therapies in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in France

Author(s)

Brighton N1, Zang A2, Castaigne JG3
1Source HE, Barnet, UK, 2Gilead, Boulogne-Billancourt, 75, France, 3Kite a Gilead Company, Cambridge, UK

OBJECTIVES:

The annual incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in France is 5071 people per year. 10-15% of DLBCL patients have primary refractory disease and one in three relapse following first-line therapy. Prior to the availability of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, the prognosis for relapsed or refractory (r/r) DLBCL was poor, with a median overall survival of 6.3 months. The efficacy and safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; a CAR T-cell therapy) was evaluated in the single-arm phase II ZUMA-1 trial, which demonstrated durable responses, a median overall survival of 25.8 months and a 43% survival rate at 5 years. This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel versus other CAR T-cell therapies (tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel] and lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]) in the treatment of r/r DLBCL, from a French healthcare system perspective.

METHODS:

A partitioned survival model was used to extrapolate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. Two matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were performed to reweight the patient population from ZUMA-1 to better reflect the patient populations in each of JULIET (tisa-cel) and TRANSCEND (liso-cel). Survival curves for progression-free survival and overall survival were based on independent mixture cure models fitted to the JULIET, TRANSCEND, and reweighted ZUMA-1 data. Utility values were derived from ZUMA-1 and costs were obtained from French registries and published sources. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 4%. List prices for axi-cel and tisa-cel were used, but as there is no publicly available price for liso-cel, the French list price of tisa-cel was used.

RESULTS:

Axi-cel is associated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €15,470 and €17,841 compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel, respectively; incremental QALYs are 2.09 and 1.73, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with other CAR T-cell therapies, axi-cel is expected to represent a cost-effective use of French healthcare resources.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE146

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Organizational Practices, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Trials, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Industry

Disease

SDC: Rare & Orphan Diseases, STA: Personalized & Precision Medicine

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×