Isavuconazole for the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis: A Canadian Cost-Utility Analysis

Author(s)

Beauchemin C1, Guinan K1, Mathurin K1, Dufresne SF2, Rotstein C3, Claveau D4, Landry L4, Lachaine J1
1PeriPharm inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4AVIR Pharma Inc., Blainville, QC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: Invasive mold infections (IMI) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts, with fatality rates approaching 100% when therapy is delayed. Among IMI, aspergillosis (IA) is far more common than mucormycosis (IM). As a result, IA-targeted empirical treatment with voriconazole is often initiated in patients with suspected pulmonary IMI, but this therapy overlooks IM. Recently, isavuconazole has been approved in Canada as a monotherapy for the treatment of both IA and IM. The objective of this study was to assess the economic impact of isavuconazole compared to voriconazole for the treatment of suspected pulmonary IMI in Canada.

METHODS: A decision tree was developed over a 5-year time horizon from the Canadian Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal perspectives. The target population were patients with suspected pulmonary IMI, among which IA and IM were estimated to account for 95% and 5%, respectively. Efficacy parameters, including the percentage of patients using a second-line treatment and the rate of all-cause mortality, were extracted from the isavuconazole trials (SECURE and VITAL). Costs included were those associated with treatment acquisition, hospitalization, management of adverse events and productivity loss. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were also conducted.

RESULTS: Isavuconazole was associated with a gain of 0.146 QALY, compared to voriconazole for IMI. From a MoH perspective, isavuconazole and voriconazole were associated with total costs of $C48,479 and $C44,088, respectively (difference $C4,391), which resulted in an incremental cost-utility ratio of $C30,160/QALY. Results were similar from a societal perspective. PSA for isavuconazole showed that it remained a cost-effective strategy in 62% of simulations from a MoH perspective, relative to a willingness to pay threshold of $C50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS: This economic evaluation demonstrates that, in comparison to voriconazole, isavuconazole is a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of patients suspected of having an IMI.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PIN44

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×