Measuring Health Inequality Aversion in Canada: An Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off Experiment

Author(s)

Iragorri N1, Ali S2, Mishra S3, Sander B4
1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Western University, London, ON, Canada, 3Unity Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the extent to which Canadians are averse to health inequalities, a critical component for equity-informative economic evaluations but lacking in the Canadian context.

METHODS: We conducted three experiments among representative samples of adult Canadians to elicit value judgements about reducing socioeconomic-related health inequality (i.e. the gap in healthy life expectancy between the highest and lowest household income quintiles) vs. improving overall population health. Each experiment compared two programs: (i) universal and tailored vaccination; (ii) non-specific prevention programs (universal prevention vs. tailored prevention interventions); (iii) generic health care programs (program A vs. program B). Tailored programs and program B had a more equitable distribution of additional life years, while universal programs and program A were more efficient. We used benefit trade-off analysis to estimate the Atkinson health inequality aversion index.

RESULTS: We recruited 3,000 adult Canadians (1,000/experiment). Preferences for the vaccination, prevention, and generic interventions were distributed as follows: minimizing inequalities (i.e., egalitarians; Atkinson Index undefined): 54%, 55%, and 57%, respectively; maximizing the health of the population with the highest income (i.e., pro rich; Atkinson Index<0): 31%, 22%, and 16% respectively; willingness to trade some health to reduce inequalities (i.e., weighted prioritarians; Atkinson Index>0): 13%, 19%, and 22% respectively; improving the health of the individuals with the lowest income (i.e., maximins; Atkinson Index=∞): 0%, 1%, and 3%, respectively; and maximizing total health (i.e., health maximizers; Atkinson Index=0): 2%, 3%, and 2%, respectively. The median response reflected a preference for minimizing health inequalities across the three experiments. A stronger aversion to health inequality was observed among females, younger respondents (18-40 years old), and respondents with lower income (<$50,000 household income per year).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a strong aversion to health inequality among Canadians with over half of respondents consistently willing to minimize health inequalities regardless of the cost to efficiency.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Acceptance Code

P59

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health Disparities & Equity, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction, Survey Methods

Disease

no-additional-disease-conditions-specialized-treatment-areas, Vaccines

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×