Real World Data & Information Systems Subcategories
Data Protection, Integrity, & Quality Assurance
Published Mar 2003
Citation
Motheral B, Brooks J, Clark MA, et al. A checklist for retroactive database studies – report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases. Value Health. 2003;6(2):90-97.
Abstract
Introduction: Health-related retrospective databases, in
particular claims databases, continue to be an important
data source for outcomes research. However, retrospective
databases pose a series of methodological challenges,
some of which are unique to this data source.
Methods: In an effort to assist decision makers in evaluating
the quality of published studies that use healthrelated
retrospective databases, a checklist was developed
that focuses on issues that are unique to database studies
or are particularly problematic in database research. This
checklist was developed primarily for the commonly used
medical claims or encounter-based databases but could
potentially be used to assess retrospective studies that
employ other types of databases, such as disease registries
and national survey data.
Results: Written in the form of 27 questions, the checklist
can be used to guide decision makers as they consider
the database, the study methodology, and the study conclusions.
Checklist questions cover a wide range of issues,
including relevance, reliability and validity, data linkages,
eligibility determination, research design, treatment
effects, sample selection, censoring, variable definitions,
resource valuation, statistical analysis, generalizability,
and data interpretation.
Conclusions: For many of the questions, key references
are provided as a resource for those who want to further
examine a particular issue.
Keywords: claims databases, outcomes research, research
design, statistics.
Health & Insurance Records Systems
Published Mar 2003
Citation
Motheral B, Brooks J, Clark MA, et al. A checklist for retroactive database studies – report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases. Value Health. 2003;6(2):90-97.
Abstract
Introduction: Health-related retrospective databases, in
particular claims databases, continue to be an important
data source for outcomes research. However, retrospective
databases pose a series of methodological challenges,
some of which are unique to this data source.
Methods: In an effort to assist decision makers in evaluating
the quality of published studies that use healthrelated
retrospective databases, a checklist was developed
that focuses on issues that are unique to database studies
or are particularly problematic in database research. This
checklist was developed primarily for the commonly used
medical claims or encounter-based databases but could
potentially be used to assess retrospective studies that
employ other types of databases, such as disease registries
and national survey data.
Results: Written in the form of 27 questions, the checklist
can be used to guide decision makers as they consider
the database, the study methodology, and the study conclusions.
Checklist questions cover a wide range of issues,
including relevance, reliability and validity, data linkages,
eligibility determination, research design, treatment
effects, sample selection, censoring, variable definitions,
resource valuation, statistical analysis, generalizability,
and data interpretation.
Conclusions: For many of the questions, key references
are provided as a resource for those who want to further
examine a particular issue.
Keywords: claims databases, outcomes research, research
design, statistics.
Full Content
Download PDFReproducibility and Replicability
-
HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of Hypothesis Evaluating Real-World Evidence Studies on Treatment Effects
-
Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness
-
Reporting to Improve Reproducibility and Facilitate Validity Assessment for Healthcare Database Studies V1.0
-
Using Real-World Data for Coverage and Payment Decisions
All Real World Data & Information Systems Reports
Please Note: Reports are in reverse chronological order.
Published Mar 2003
Citation
Motheral B, Brooks J, Clark MA, et al. A checklist for retroactive database studies – report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases. Value Health. 2003;6(2):90-97.
Abstract
Introduction: Health-related retrospective databases, in
particular claims databases, continue to be an important
data source for outcomes research. However, retrospective
databases pose a series of methodological challenges,
some of which are unique to this data source.
Methods: In an effort to assist decision makers in evaluating
the quality of published studies that use healthrelated
retrospective databases, a checklist was developed
that focuses on issues that are unique to database studies
or are particularly problematic in database research. This
checklist was developed primarily for the commonly used
medical claims or encounter-based databases but could
potentially be used to assess retrospective studies that
employ other types of databases, such as disease registries
and national survey data.
Results: Written in the form of 27 questions, the checklist
can be used to guide decision makers as they consider
the database, the study methodology, and the study conclusions.
Checklist questions cover a wide range of issues,
including relevance, reliability and validity, data linkages,
eligibility determination, research design, treatment
effects, sample selection, censoring, variable definitions,
resource valuation, statistical analysis, generalizability,
and data interpretation.
Conclusions: For many of the questions, key references
are provided as a resource for those who want to further
examine a particular issue.
Keywords: claims databases, outcomes research, research
design, statistics.