Comparison of the Clinical and Economic Impact of Two COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in High Risk Individuals in the Tokyo Prefecture

Author(s)

Kohli M1, Hagiwara Y2, Igarashi A3, Joshi K2, Lee A1, Maschio M1, Van de Velde N2, Beck E2
1Quadrant Health Economics Inc, Cambridge, ON, Canada, 2Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 3Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

OBJECTIVES: Immunocompromised (IC) individuals and those aged ≥65 years are considered at high risk of severe disease following COVID-19 infections. In Japan, COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended to protect these vulnerable populations. Recent analyses found the Moderna mRNA vaccine more effective in preventing medical encounters following COVID-19 infections than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in both populations (e.g., relative risk for hospitalization of 0.83 in IC individuals). The objectives of the study were to separately estimate the impact of differential vaccine effectiveness on clinical outcomes and treatment costs for individuals aged ≥65 years, and IC individuals aged ≥18 in the Tokyo prefecture.

METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used to predict clinical and economic outcomes of vaccinating with either the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines over a 1-year time horizon. Base-case and low to high infection incidence scenarios were created based on the observed incidence in Tokyo during the Omicron period. Fall 2023 vaccine coverage was estimated from previous vaccines. Consequences of infection (outpatient and hospitalizations, myocarditis, death, long-COVID) and COVID-19 treatment costs were calculated.

RESULTS: Considering the base-case and low to high incidence scenarios, vaccinating persons aged ≥65 years with the Moderna vaccine could prevent additional COVID-19 outcomes compared with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine: 1,500 (1,120–1,870) hospitalizations, 120 (90-150) deaths and 1,170 (880-1,460) cases of long COVID. The reduced morbidity corresponds to ¥0.94B-¥1.56B in treatment costs saved. Compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the Moderna vaccine could prevent an additional 550 (420-690) hospitalizations, 46 (35-58) deaths, and 480 (360-600) cases of long-COVID in the IC population, saving ¥344M-¥573M in treatment costs.

CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinating those aged ≥65 years and IC individuals aged ≥18 years with the Moderna vaccine in the Tokyo prefecture is estimated to prevent more cases of COVID-19 related hospitalizations, deaths, and long-COVID, and associated treatment costs compared with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE289

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Vaccines

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×