Objective

To provide emerging good practice guidance for addressing preference heterogeneity in choice data, specifically from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) or best-worst scaling (BWS) studies.

Rationale

Health preference research (HPR) typically quantifies trade-offs that patients, caregivers, or physicians are willing to make between clinical and non-clinical benefits, risks, administration and other healthcare aspects. While many HPR studies are concerned with average preferences, ‘one size fits all’ decisions and policies ignoring heterogeneity in preferences and treatment priorities can result in unintended consequences. Given the lack of consensus-based recommendations and an increasing number of complex models addressing heterogeneity, addressing this gap in guidance is important to improve overall healthcare decision making.

Co-Chairs:

Jag Chhatwal, PhD

Harvard Medical School / Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, MA, United States

Rachael Fleurence, PhD

Value Analytics Labs
Boston, MA, United States

Leadership Group

Turgay Ayer

Chief Technology Officer, Value Analytics Labs
Boston, MA, United States

Ran Balicer, PhD, MD

Chief Innovation Officer, Clalit Health Services
Tel Aviv, Israel

Jiang Bian

Professor and Chief Data Scientist, University of Florida
Gainesville, FL, United States

Saskia Cheyne

Research Fellow, Monash University
Sydney, NSW, Australia

Dalia Dawoud, MSc, PhD, BSc

PEHTA Consulting Ltd
London, LON, United Kingdom

Diana Delnoij

Chief Scientific Officer, Zorginstituut Nederland
Diemen, Netherlands

Sven Klijn, MSc, BSc

Director, Bristol Myers Squibb
Utrecht, UT, Netherlands

Riaz Qureshi

Denver, CO, United States

Rebecca Trowman

Perth, WA, Australia
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×