Drugs For Rare Diseases- How To Fund Them?

Published Sep 17, 2012
Toronto, ON, Canada- Enzyme replacement therapies for rare inherited metabolic diseases are among the most expensive drugs in the world and have created a dilemma for public drug payers. Often the cost effectiveness of a new drug is used to guide public drug funding, decisions, and this is usually estimated from the efficacy of the new treatment in randomized clinical trials. However, randomized trials may be difficult or impossible to complete for truly rare conditions. A recent report published in Value in Health, "An Evaluation Framework for Funding Drugs for Rare Diseases" describes a novel approach to evaluating such drugs based on an understanding of the disease and the available evidence. The study was co-authored by members of the Ontario Public Drug Programs Drugs for Rare Diseases Working Group. Lead author, Dr. Eric Winquist says, "Our evaluation framework attempts to systematically address the unique challenges raised when considering funding new drugs for rare diseases, which are often expensive, with an evidence-based publicly funded drug program."

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health. For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

ISPOR Releases Emerging Good Practices Guidance on Quantifying Specialized Knowledge in Healthcare

Nov 6, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report that identifies existing structured expert elicitation protocols that can support healthcare decision making and provides important insights on how to choose which protocols may be the most appropriate for different scenarios, such as time-constrained decisions, early-stage technology assessments, and public health policies.

Measuring What Matters: Broadening the Scope of Health Economics Evaluation to Incorporate Well-Being

Jul 9, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers in Value in Health that offer insights into facets of economic evaluation aimed to incorporate well-being into decision making.

Confronting the Backlash Against QALYs: Key Insights From Leading Health Economists

Jun 18, 2024

ISPOR announced the publication of a collection of papers that examine the long-standing debate surrounding the use of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and alternative measures in healthcare decision making.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×