A Call to Action: In Search of Standardized Measures of Whole Health in Eight Nationally Representative Datasets in the United States

Author(s)

Findley P1, Manning S2, Wiener RC3, Shen C4, Wang H5, Dwibedi N6, Sambamoorthi U2
1Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 3West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA, 4Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA, 5JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 6West Virginia University, School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, USA

OBJECTIVES: The Whole Health (WH) Model is an innovative holistic model that centers around “what is important to the person” rather than the disease-driven approach that focuses more on the disease than the person. The WH model identifies several dimensions to personalized whole health including sleep, nutrition, movement, emotional health, and mind-body therapies. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been a pioneer in implementing the WH model with studies on Veterans within the VA system showing promise of improved outcomes. However, studies in the general population are lacking. This study investigated the availability of measures related to each of the dimension of WH model in eight nationally representative datasets.

METHODS: The eight national datasets examined for this study were: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(NHANES),Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System(BRFSS),Medical Expenditure Panel(MEPS), National Health Interview Survey(NHIS),Health and Retirement Study(HRS),Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey(MCBS), Panel Study of Income Dynamics(PSID), and National Social Life, Health and Aging Project(NSHAP). We used a machine-assisted literature search with Python.

RESULTS: Since 2010, 24,811 papers have been published using these datasets. We searched for measures in 5 WH dimensions-sleep(hours of sleep, daytime sleepiness, Pittsburgh Sleep Index), nutrition (fruits per day, vegetables per day),movement (exercise/week, body mass index), emotional health (psychological distress scale, depression), and mind-body (use of complementary or alternative medicines, meditation, yoga). NHANES, NHIS, and PSID provided data in 4 components; BRFSS, HRS, MCBS, and NSHAP provided data in 3 components; and MEPS provided data in 2 components.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of data to evaluate the effectiveness of the WH model on health outcomes at the individual and systems level. Currently ecological studies that combine diverse data sources are not possible. Our findings highlight the need for increased efforts and funding to collect nationally representative data on WH with standardized measures.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

PCR173

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Patient Engagement, Public Health, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

Alternative Medicine, Mental Health, Nutrition

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×