Patient Preferences for Attributes of Advanced Migraine Prevention Medications: Findings from a Discrete Choice Experiment

Author(s)

Schwedt T1, Martin A2, Kymes S3, Talon B4, Lee XY5, Cady R6, Asher D3, Karnik-Henry M3, Mulvihill E2, Bates D2, Beusterien K2, Hallissey B7
1Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2Cerner Enviza, North Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA, 3Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA, 4Lundbeck LLC, DOWNERS GROVE, IL, USA, 5H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6Lundbeck LLC, Ozark, MO, USA, 7Kantar Health, Horsham, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability, the two most important migraine treatment attributes. This study assessed the relative importance of other attributes in the choice of preventive migraine treatment from the patient perspective.

METHODS: This non-interventional, cross-sectional study enrolled US adults with self-reported migraine diagnoses, who experienced ≥5 monthly migraine days, and had tried ≥2 prescription migraine treatments. A 25-minute discrete choice online survey was used to assess treatment preferences by having respondents select between two profiles that varied in attributes: speed of onset (24hr, 1wk, or 3mo), durability of prevention (wears off 1wk prior to next dose, 2wks prior to next dose, or does not wear off), mode of administration (IV, self-injection, or cranial injections), administration setting (at-home or in-office), and dosing frequency (1mo or 3mo). Hierarchical Bayes modeling estimated attribute-level preference weights. A latent class analysis identified subgroups that differed in their preferences.

RESULTS: 604 patients were analyzed. Mode of administration, durability of prevention, and speed of onset had the highest relative importance; administration setting and frequency of dosing had the lowest. Four groups with differing preferences were identified: those preferring auto-injection (n=128, 21%); those averse to cranial injections (n=189, 31%); those preferring faster speed of onset (n=158, 26%); and those preferring longer durability and clinicians to administer treatment (n=129, 21%). Except for those preferring auto-injection, all groups were willing to accept IV administration to achieve other treatment goals, indicating that three-fourths of participants were not averse to IV infusion as a route of administration.

CONCLUSIONS: Among people living with migraine who have ≥5 monthly migraine days, important attributes of preventive migraine treatment were mode of administration, durability of effect, and speed of onset. Infusion as a route of administration was not considered a barrier for most patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

CO39

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×