Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of IDH1/2 Mutational Testing and Treatment Selection among Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Routine Clinical Practice

Author(s)

Klink A1, Copher R2, Knoth RL2, Marshall L3, Hou Y4, Gajra A1
1Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Dublin, OH, USA, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA, 3Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Rock Hill, SC, USA, 4Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Lexington , MA, USA

OBJECTIVES : In the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), molecularly targeted therapy guided by timely mutational testing can lead to improved patient outcomes. This study assessed how IDH1/2 mutational testing and results are accessed, used and adopted, and factors associated with treatment selection for patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) AML.

METHODS : US hematologists/oncologists from the Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network (OPEN) who had treated patients with AML completed a 23-item questionnaire in February/March 2020 assessing perceptions and experiences involving mutational testing and AML treatment selection. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS : Nearly all physicians (95%) responded that they perform IDH1/2 mutational testing at AML diagnosis, 75% at relapse/progression, and 15% at completion of induction/remission. Approximately one-third (35%) utilized in-house pathology services, while the rest sent the sample off-site. Most (75%) received IDH1/2 mutational test results within 10 days, and the remainder (25%) within 11–20 days. The results were most often (75%) and sometimes (20%) used to select the AML treatment regimen; 5% reported results took too long and did not impact treatment selection. The majority of respondents (55%) were willing to wait (median=10 days) for mutational status results before starting treatment; 20% would not wait but would change treatment based on IDH mutation status; 20% would not wait and would not change treatment based on IDH mutation status. The majority (85%) preferred enasidenib as first therapy in patients with IDH2-mutated RR AML, while 15% preferred high-dose cytarabine (10%) or low-dose cytarabine (5%).

CONCLUSIONS : The results demonstrate that for those AML treatments targeting specific mutations, mutational testing and its appropriate timing does guide physicians’ treatment selection. Physicians recognize the value of testing, and when results are timely, the results are used in determining appropriate treatment for patients with AML.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN153

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Hospital and Clinical Practices, Prescribing Behavior

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×