EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF IMRECOXIB, CELECOXIB AND DICLOFENAC IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Sun X1, Zhen X2, Hu X1, LI Y3, Gu Y4, Zhao Z1, Dong H1
1Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2Shandong University, Jinan, China, 3Zhejiang Univerisity, HANGZHOU, China, 4Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, MD, China

OBJECTIVES

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed for relief of the symptoms of osteoarthritis. The efficacy and safety of different NSAIDs are still studied, especially between the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (COX-2) and non-selective NSAIDs (ns-NSAIDs). A new Cox-2 NSAID called imrecoxib was approved by China Food and Drug Administration in 2011, and the efficacy and safety compared with other NSAIDs stay unexplored. This study is aimed to access the overall efficacy and safety of imrecoxib, celecoxib (COX-2), diclofenac (ns-NSAIDs) based on the existing literature.

METHODS

25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from the time of database establishment to Nov 19, 2019 were systematically reviewed in 8 databases, which compared any of imrecoxib, celecoxib, diclofenac and placebo. The primary outcome was the mean change of different drugs on patient’s pain score (VAS mm); the sencondary outcomes were the rate of total adverse events and gastrointestinal (GI) events. The rate of adverse events was adjusted with standardized doses. Literature with less than 4-week treatment duration were excluded.

RESULTS

Celecoxib (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.52 [95%CI -0.96 to -0.09]) was significantly more effective than placebo, while imrecoxib (-0.67 [-1.97 to 0.63]) and diclofenac (-0.49 [-1.06 to 0.08]) were more effective than placebo. Celecoxib (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 [95%CI 0.84 to 1.28]) and diclofenac (1.27 [0.89 to 1.81]) were more unsafe than placebo, whereas imrecoxib was not. Similar results could be found in the analysis of the rate of GI events, celecoxib (1.05 [0.83 to 1.32]) and diclofenac (1.39 [0.95 to 2.03]) were more unsafe than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

It seemed that imrecoxib was associated with better efficacy and fewer adverse events. Since there were sparse RCTs have been reported for imrecoxib, the conclusion should be adopted with caution. Meanwhile, a nocebo effect was observed in the analysis of the rate of adverse events, which need further discussion.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PIH21

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs, Geriatrics

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×