Replicating a Partitioned Survival Model From an ICER Report Using Generative AI

Author(s)

Ayer T1, Samur S2, Bayraktar E3, Ermis T3, Yildirim IF3, Chhatwal J4
1Value Analytics Labs and Georgia Tech, Atlanta, MA, USA, 2Value Analytics Labs, Chantilly, VA, USA, 3Value Analytics Labs, Boston, MA, USA, 4Harvard Medical School and Value Analytics Labs, Wilmington, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Generative-AI has demonstrated potential in automating complex tasks through advanced natural language processing. Yet, its application in health economic modeling is still emerging. Partitioned survival models (PSMs) pose unique challenges due to their complexity and need for precise parameter extraction. Leveraging Generative-AI for PSM development could significantly reduce the time and expertise required. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using Generative-AI to replicate a PSM, utilizing a published benchmark as a reference.

METHODS: We replicated the PSM from the 2022 Multiple-Myeloma Report by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review using a life sciences industry-specialized Generative-AI platform, called ValueGen.AI. First, we developed multi-agent pipelines for parameter extraction using GPT-4o and utilizing CrewAI, LangChain, and OpenAI libraries in Python. Second, we created a general PSM template using the Heemod library in R and an API with the Plumber library to automate PSM model creation and execution. We uploaded the published Multiple-Myeloma report to ValueGen.AI and prompted ValueGen.AI to build a PSM for Ide-cel and its comparator (Triple- or Quad Refractor). We evaluated Generative-AI-predicted costs, utilities and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS: The ValueGen.AI platform successfully replicated the model structure and parameters of the published Multiple-Myeloma Report. Generative-AI-based PSM estimated Ide-cel cost at $503,023 (vs $646,000 in the report) and comparator cost at $138,582 (vs $276,000). Generative AI-based PSM estimated Ide-cel QALY at 2.239 (vs 2.24) and comparator QALY at 1.06 (vs 1.08). The error margins for delta cost and delta QALYs between the model generated vs. published values were 1.5% and 1.76%, respectively. Additionally, the estimated ICER value was $308,744 (vs $318,966), resulting in a 3.2% error margin.

CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of accurately replicating published partitioned survival models using Generative-AI. Future research should aim replicating more complex decision-analytic models, thereby advancing their application in health economic modeling.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

HTA77

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics

Disease

Neurological Disorders, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×