A Non-Systematic Review of Equity in Oncology HTA Submissions to NICE

Author(s)

Bowes K1, Briggs JA1, Brown AE1, Goldsmith-Martin G1, Khankhel Z2
1Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK, 2Genesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: A key goal of a nationalized health care system is not only to improve health outcomes but reduce inequity in health. Equity considerations are typically highlighted and discussed in health technology assessment (HTA) submissions, subsequent evidence reviews, and committee appraisals. Here, we assess equity considerations raised in oncology HTAs submitted to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over the previous 2 years.

METHODS: Documents (i.e. company submission, final appraisal document, and committee papers) from oncology HTAs submitted to NICE in the last two years (03/2022-03/2024) were reviewed to understand whether equity was considered in the underlying systematic review, economic model, and/or by the evidence review group (ERG), NICE review committee, or patient groups. Relevant data were extracted by a single researcher, with 20% validated by a second, independent researcher. Extracted data were reviewed to synthesize trends related to equity in HTAs.

RESULTS: Equity concerns were raised by the company, patient groups, or clinical experts in 30/70 submissions. Protected characteristics most frequently flagged were related to race/ethnicity/culture (12/70), age (12/70), and geography/access (12/70). Equity concerns were raised by the company in 18 submissions, 11 of which presented relevant subgroup analyses to address the issue. The ERG disagreed with the company’s handling of equity in 4 submissions (2 for inappropriate QALY weightings, 2 for insufficient clinical evidence for relevant subgroups). In most submissions, the NICE committee concluded that its recommendation would not affect protected groups differently or that geographic inequity within the National Health Service (NHS) was out of its control and hence not considered in the final appraisal.

CONCLUSIONS: Though equity concerns are frequently raised in oncology HTA submissions, they are often not factored into the evidence submission or final appraisal, highlighting a need for guidelines or more practical measures to ensure health inequities are fully captured in the decision-making process.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

SA13

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Health Disparities & Equity, Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×