A Cost-Consequence Analysis of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma Across Gulf Cooperation Council Countries
Author(s)
Hashmi S1, Elkonaissi I1, Al dallal S2, Hamadah A3, Al-Khabori M4, Taha R5, Hamad A6, Prem S7, Al-Mansour M8, Alzahrani M9, Al-Abdulkarim H9, Marei M10, Alrajhi A10, Albabtain A11, Al Nahedh M11, Albanyan O12, Alharbi M13, Shaheen R14, Ball G15, Mereani W16
1Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 3Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Kuwait, Kuwait, 4Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Seeb, Oman, 5National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, 6Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, DA, Qatar, 7Bahrain Oncology Center, Al Sayh, Bahrain, 8King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 9King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affair, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 10King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 12King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 13HEPA Solutions, Jeddah, CA, USA, 14HEPA Solutions, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 15Gilead Sciences Canada Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 16Gilead Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The treatment landscape has dramatically changed for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) since the introduction of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy. However, limited availability of CAR T centers in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) area has necessitated healthcare abroad referrals for eligible patients. The aim of this study was to assess projected economic consequences of adopting CAR T referral pathways to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) compared to referrals to the United States (US) or Europe for R/R LBCL patients in the GCC.
METHODS: A cost-consequence analysis was conducted to compare referral scenarios. The model incorporated annualized direct medical costs (drug acquisition, administration, and resource utilization costs) and direct non-medical costs including transportation and daily allowances. Number of patient referrals, resource utilization and treatment-related costs (reported in USD) were sourced from medical bills, public formularies, business centers, and local clinical experts. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty in input parameters.
RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, 14 R/R LBCL patients were referred abroad from GCC countries at an average per patient cost of $1,689,945 including $519,572 for drug acquisition, $1,088,175 for direct medical care, and $82,198 for non-medical costs. Comparable average per patient costs for referral to KSA were estimated at $636,751(drug acquisition: $436,810; direct medical: $162,667; direct non-medical: $37,274). Despite observing some minor referral cost variations across individual GCC countries, utilizing healthcare abroad referral pathways to KSA may help GCC health authorities realize substantially reduced referral expenditures for CAR T-eligible patients with R/R LBCL.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CAR T referral to KSA is a cost-efficient approach for GCC countries compared to referrals to the US or Europe. Adoption of KSA referrals could potentially enable more patients within the GCC to receive treatment with the same budget spending.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE13
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis, Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology