Economic Evidence Associated With Treatments for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Progressed on Prior Therapies: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

Author(s)

Kachru N1, Pashley A2, Kaiser E3, Marris C4, Radford M1
1Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA, 2Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK, 3Costello Medical, Boston, MA, USA, 4Costello Medical, Manchester, UK

OBJECTIVES: NSCLC, the most dominant form of lung cancer, accounts for 80–85% of all cases. USA national estimates suggest it to be the fifth-costliest tumor. This SLR aimed to identify economic evidence, including economic evaluations, health state utility values (HSUV), and cost and resource use (CRU) data for patients with advanced, metastatic, or recurrent NSCLC who progressed on any prior NSCLC treatment.

METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, The International Health Technology Assessment Database and NHS Economic Evaluation Database were searched in June 2023, and supplemented with grey literature hand-searches. Quality of extracted publications was assessed using the Drummond checklist. Due to the volume of records, prioritization was undertaken according to assessed NSCLC population, geography of data collection, publication date and outcomes reported.

RESULTS: Of the 104,174 records retrieved, 42 unique studies were prioritized, reporting on economic evaluations (n=23), HSUV (n=10) and CRU data (n=16). Multiple studies (n=18) reported varying incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs) comparative to docetaxel. A Japanese study found the incremental cost/quality adjusted life years (QALY) of nab-paclitaxel compared to docetaxel was JPY 19,694,424, whilst a UK study reported £35,657/QALY comparing nivolumab to docetaxel. Improved quality of life compared to docetaxel was reported for pembrolizumab (n=1; HSUV: 0.687–0.761) and nivolumab (n=1; difference in mean change in utility index scores: 0.027). Reported overall treatments cost varied across studies, from €2,671 (annual cost per patient, second-line [2L] treatment for non-squamous NSCLC without immunotherapy) to £67,283 (total mean costs during on-treatment with atezolizumab). Mean length of hospital stay (n=6) ranged from 0.7–36 days.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall economic burden of treating NSCLC is high, particularly for patients who progress onto 2L+ regimens, due to the high cost of healthcare resources and therapeutic options. There is a need for novel therapies that extend survival, reducing progression-related hospitalizations and additional treatment regimens.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE127

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×