Establishing Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-CLL17 Domain Scores: An Analysis Based on the TRANSCEND CLL 004 Study in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Author(s)
Eliason L1, Fofana F2, Wang L1, Riedell PA3, Guo S4
1Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2Evidera PPD, Ede, Netherlands, 3The David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 4Evidera PPD, Waltham, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To establish meaningful change thresholds at patient and group levels for the newly developed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 17-item chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)–specific module (EORTC QLQ-CLL17) in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma.
METHODS:
EORTC QLQ-CLL17 data and selected anchor measures collected from the TRANSCEND CLL 004 study (NCT03331198) of the CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) were assessed at baseline (prelymphodepletion); pre-infusion on the day of liso-cel administration; and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 months after liso-cel administration. Postbaseline visits were pooled to support the analyses. Change thresholds for each of the EORTC QLQ-CLL17 domains were triangulated based on estimates derived from anchor- and distribution-based analyses, in accordance with published guidance. Included anchors were EORTC QLQ-C30 items (9 [pain], 12 [weakness], 22 [worry], and 29 [overall health]) with adequate longitudinal correlations with EORTC QLQ-CLL17 domain scores (Spearman correlation coefficient >0.3).RESULTS:
Analysis included 62 patients with 240 observations across visits. Estimated meaningful within-patient change thresholds for improvement (deterioration) were −11 points (11 points) for symptom burden score and −16 points (16 points) for physical condition/fatigue, worries/fears on health, and functioning scores. Estimated meaningful group-level change thresholds for improvement (deterioration) ranged from −9 to −5 points (5‒9 points) for symptom burden score, −11 to −6 points (6‒12 points) for physical condition/fatigue score, and −10 to −5 points (5‒9 points) for worries/fears on health and functioning scores.CONCLUSIONS:
To our knowledge, this is the first study to propose change thresholds for interpreting improvement and deterioration in EORTC QLQ-CLL17 domain scores at patient and group levels. These findings provide a foundation to better interpret treatment impact on health-related quality of life in future studies.Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
PCR78
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Oncology