Cost-Effectiveness of Maribavir for Post-Transplant Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection With or Without Resistance: A UK Perspective
Author(s)
Chowdhury E1, de Lacey T1, Ressa R1, Poirrier JE2, Cain P3, Fenu E4, Amorosi SL5
1Parexel, HEOR Modeling, London, UK, 2Parexel, HEOR Modeling, Wavre, WBR, Belgium, 3Takeda, UK Health Economics, London, UK, 4Takeda, Global Health Economics, Zurich, Switzerland, 5Takeda, Global Health Economics, Boston, MA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with morbidity and mortality following solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplant (SOT/HCT). Toxicities and development of refractory (with or without resistance [R/R]) CMV limit current anti-CMV agents use. In the Phase 3 SOLSTICE (NCT02931539) study of R/R CMV infection in SOT/HCT recipients, maribavir achieved superior efficacy (CMV viremia clearance) with an improved safety profile against investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir). This analysis investigates the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus IAT for treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV.
METHODS: The model comprises two consecutive Markov models. A three-state model with 4-week cycles is used for 18 months, capturing transitions between clinically significant CMV (CMV DNA >lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] requiring treatment), non-clinically significant CMV (CMV DNA <LLOQ or CMV DNA >LLOQ not requiring treatment), and dead. From 18 months onwards, patients move to a two-state, alive/dead model with annual cycles. Clinical event rates and transition probabilities were largely informed by SOLSTICE and data from observational studies. In SOLSTICE, patients were aged 53 years (average); 60% received SOT and 40% received HCT. Utilities were from SOLSTICE and a utility vignette study. Costs were primarily estimated from the UK National Schedule of NHS Costs. The price of maribavir was converted to pounds from the US list price for an 8-week treatment regimen ($50,000; June 2022). Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3.5%.
RESULTS: Maribavir incurs an incremental cost of £4,461 for an incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.221. Relative to IAT, maribavir achieves an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £20,163, which would be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold range of £20,000 to £30,000 per QALY. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, maribavir was cost-effective at the £30,000 threshold in 62% of iterations.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports that maribavir provides a cost-effective alternative to IAT for treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE571
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas