Investigating Resource Costs and the Experiences of Patients and Healthcare Professionals in the Treatment of Fabry Disease With Enzyme Replacement Therapy – A Multi-Country Study
Author(s)
Keyzor I1, Maria Martins A2, Kalkan Uçar S3, Yamakawa H4, Giuliano J5, Shohet S1, Baldock L6, Andiappan M6, Turner L7, Chien YH8, Negishi K9, Arslan N10, Niu DM11
1Amicus Therapeutics UK LTD., Marlow, BKM, UK, 2Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey, 4Keio University, Keio, Japan, 5Amicus Therapeutics, Inc, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 6OPEN Health, Marlow, UK, 7Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, 8National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, 9Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, 10Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey, 11Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Enzyme replacement therapies (ERT) offer valuable treatment options for patients with Fabry disease (FD). However, ERTs must be prepared and administered as intravenous infusions every two weeks in a hospital setting. We wanted to better understand the resource requirements associated with ERT infusions, possible burden and impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity for patients and their caregivers.
METHODS: Patients with FD who are receiving ERT and their caregivers were identified and recruited from specialist centres from Brazil, Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey. A study protocol was implemented (Clinicaltrials.gov reference NCT04281537) and local ethics approval was obtained for each participating site. Time and motion methodology was applied to quantify health care professional (HCP) resources associated with ERT administration. Questionnaires were fielded directly to patients and their caregivers assessing various outcomes including HRQoL, wellbeing, levels of fatigue, work productivity and the strain of providing care.
RESULTS: Total of 76 patients were recruited (Brazil n=23, Japan n=4, Taiwan n=30, Turkey n=19). The study successfully collected data per protocol on total HCP time associated with ERT preparation and administration, as well as impact on patients’ and caregivers’ time and costs (out-of-pocket expenses) associated with the infusion attendance. Subsequent post infusion impact on patients’ HRQoL, wellbeing, levels of fatigue and work productivity was also determined.
CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses evidence gaps surrounding the real-world resource costs and experience of FD patients and their caregivers from different countries during treatment of ERTs in a hospital setting. The observational/real-world approach successfully captured the impact for both patients and their caregivers before, during and after ERT infusion episodes. Resulting data before, during and after ERT infusion episodes can be used to improve ERT workflow, refine cost effectiveness modelling and enable more accurate comparison to alternative treatments such as oral chaperone therapies for FD.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
RWD131
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Prospective Observational Studies, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas