The Cost-Effectiveness of Belimumab for the Treatment of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in China
Author(s)
He X1, Lloyd E2, Asukai Y2, Chauhan D2, Tang Z1, Treur M3
1GSK, Shanghai, China, 2GSK, Brentford, UK, 3OPEN Health Evidence & Access, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: In China, intravenous belimumab is listed for the treatment of SLE1; however, no evaluation of its cost-effectiveness exists. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of belimumab plus standard therapy (ST) versus ST alone, among patients with SLE, from the government payer perspective in China. METHODS: This study (GSK Study 213264) utilised a modified lifetime microsimulation cost-effectiveness model2; the target population was adults with active, autoantibody-positive SLE in China. Belimumab + ST-treated patients were compared with ST-treated patients. Short-term efficacy data were implemented from a belimumab trial in North East Asia (BLISS-NEA). Long-term outcomes were modelled using longitudinal statistical models from the Hopkins Lupus Registry, calibrated using long-term organ damage outputs based on observed outcomes of belimumab-treated patients.3 China-specific costs, epidemiology data, and locally adjusted utilities were based on a targeted literature review and a key opinion leader survey. Outcomes (discounted at 5%) were incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), life-years gained, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Belimumab + ST-treated patients gained 14.92 life-years and 9.06 QALYs, versus 14.54 and 8.48, respectively, for ST-treated patients. Benefit associated with belimumab was driven by decreased organ damage and associated mortality risk. The ICUR was $6437 (2019 US dollars) per QALY gained; the ICER was $10,043 per life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS: The ICUR was within three times China’s 2019 gross domestic product ($30,651), previously used by the World Health Organisation as a cost-effectiveness threshold4 and frequently used in cost-effectiveness studies in China. These findings suggest that belimumab + ST would be more cost-effective than ST alone for the treatment of SLE in China. REFERENCES: 1GSK. Press Release. 2022. https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/china-s-national-medical-products-administration-approves-benlysta-belimumab-for-adult-patients-with-active-lupus-nephritis/#:~:text=GlaxoSmithKline%20plc%20(LSE%2FNYSE%3A,are%20receiving%20standard%20of%20care. [Accessed June 2022]. 2NICE. Belimumab Technology Appraisal Guidance. 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta752/resources/belimumab-for-treating-active-autoantibodypositive-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-pdf-82611372078277#page=14&zoom=100,0,670 [Accessed June 2022]. 3Asukai Y, et al. Value Health Reg Issues. 2020;22:S65. 4Woods B, et al. Value Health. 2016;19:929–35. FUNDING: GSK
Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE348
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
SDC: Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)