Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prostate Cancer Screening: Differences in the Cost-Effectiveness Using Evidence From Diagnostic Cohorts Versus Screening-by-Invitation Trial

Author(s)

Hao S, Clements MS
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, AB, Sweden

OBJECTIVES: Improved sensitivity and specificity using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to aid the detection of prostate cancer was found by a recent Cochrane Review and the screening-by-invitation STHLM3-MRI trial (NCT03377881). Our aim was to assess and compare the cost-effectiveness of MRI-based screening for prostate cancer in Sweden using test characteristics based on (a) the Cochrane Review and (b) the STHLM3-MRI trial.

METHODS: Cost-utility analyses from a lifetime healthcare perspective were conducted for (i) no screening, (ii) quadrennial screening using prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) test and (iii) quadrennial screening using PSA and MRI. Test characteristics were based on the Cochrane Review and the STHLM3-MRI trial. Costs were calculated for the 2020 calendar year and health state values were collated from the literature.

RESULTS: Compared with no screening, the screening strategies reduced lifetime prostate cancer mortality by 6%-10%. MRI-based screening using test characteristics based on the Cochrane Review and STHLM3-MRI trial resulted in ICERs of €54,831 and €47,162 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, which are classified as high and moderate costs per QALY gained in Sweden, respectively. This can be primarily explained by the proportion of negative MRI results from the screening-by-invitation STHLM3-MRI trial being double that from the diagnostic patient cohorts from the Cochrane Review. Compared with PSA screening, MRI-based screening reduced the numbers of lifetime biopsies by approximately 37% and 50% based on evidence from the Cochrane Review and the STHLM3-MRI trial, respectively. MRI-based screening dominated the PSA screening based on the evidence from the Cochrane Review.

CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based screening for prostate cancer is considered as cost-effective in Sweden based on the evidence from the STHLM3-MRI trial. A screening-by-invitation trial is associated with a lower proportion of MRI-positive results which leads to a modest reduction of the ICER compared with estimates based on diagnostic patient cohorts.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE72

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Diagnostics & Imaging

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×