An Economic Evaluation of Introducing Ferric Carboxymaltose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Patients With Heart Failure From the Perspective of Healthcare Payers in Sweden, Germany, France, Poland and Spain

Author(s)

McEwan P1, Harrison C1, Cohen-Solal A2, Lund LH3, Ohlsson M4, von Haehling S5, Comin-Colet J6, Pascual-Figal DA7, Ponikowski P8, Wächter S9, Dorigotti F9, Ramirez de Arellano Serna A9, Jankowska EA8
1Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, CRF, Great Britain, 2Université Paris Cité, Paris, France, 3Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden, 5University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 6Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 7University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, 8Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland, 9Vifor Pharma Group, Glattbrugg, ZH, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: This study estimates the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of introducing ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) for the treatment of iron deficiency (ID) in patients with left ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, stabilised after an episode of acute heart failure (AHF), from the perspective of healthcare payers in 5 European countries.

METHODS: A previously published Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in administration of FCM. A budget impact model (BIM) evaluated the costs associated with FCM treatment in an incident AHF hospitalisation population over 5 years. The eligible population for each country was estimated from mean published data and validated by expert opinion. Predictions on market share growth of FCM were validated by clinical expert opinion. Patient-reported (EQ-5D), event outcomes and costs were sourced from published literature and Affirm-AHF clinical trial. Country-specific discount rates were applied.

RESULTS: FCM treatment was estimated to increase quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (this increase ranged from 0.419 to 0.448 across all countries); driven by a reduction in hospitalisation for HF (HHF) events and an increase in time spent in higher Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) states. Cost offsets associated with lower HHF events resulted in FCM being dominant (more effective and less costly treatment) across all 5 countries; lifetime cost-saving per patient was €80, €173, €488, €554 and € 703 in Spain, Germany, Poland, France and Sweden, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: FCM for the treatment of ID in patients with LVEF <50%, stabilised after an episode of AHF has the potential to reduce HHF burden and deliver cost savings to healthcare systems, and is estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment across all 5 countries.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE60

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

STA: Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×