Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapies for First-Line Treatment in Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (MTNBC) in France

Author(s)

Tredan O1, Bensimon L2, Apert M3, Tehard B4, Carita M4, Khandelwal A5, Gandhi J5, Haiderali A6, Huang M6, Levy P7
1Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, 2MSD France, Puteaux, France, 3MSD France, Puteaux, 92, France, 4Vyoo agency, Paris, France, 5Complete HEOR Solutions (CHEORS), North Wales, PA, USA, 6Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 7Université Paris- Dauphine, Université PSL, LEDA, CNRS, [LEGOS], Paris, France

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapies for first-line treatment of locally advanced unresectable or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), from the French healthcare system perspective.

METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model (pre-progression, post-progression and death) was developed to estimate costs, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembrolizumab + chemotherapies vs chemotherapies. Comparison with bevacizumab + paclitaxel was included in exploratory analyses only due to lack of published overall survival data in mTNBC population. Clinical and quality of life data were derived from the phase 3 study KEYNOTE-355. Progression-free survival, overall survival and time on treatment were extrapolated over a 10-year time horizon based on parametric functions. EQ-5D-3L data were converted to French population-based utilities using the French value set. Only direct medical costs were considered, based on public sources. Costs and health outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per year. ICER was calculated as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and per life year gained (LYG). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenarios analyses were performed to assess robustness of results.

RESULTS: The model projected that pembrolizumab + chemotherapies is associated with discounted 0.67 LYG and 0.52 additional QALY vs chemotherapies as well as incremental costs of 71,660€. ICERs were 138,765€/QALY and 106,275€/LYG respectively. Sensitivity analyses led to an ICER varying from 115,522€/QALY to 205,277€/QALY. The willingness-to-pay threshold should reach 200,000 €/QALY, to have more than 80% probability of being cost-effective. Exploratory analyses showed bevacizumab + paclitaxel remained dominated under all plausible scenarios considered.

CONCLUSIONS: Combining pembrolizumab with chemotherapies improves life expectancy and appears cost-effective versus chemotherapies alone for first-line treatment of mTNBC in France, assuming a WTP under 200,000€/QALY.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE10

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×