Race and Ethnicity in Oracle EHR Real-World Data: A Contrast to Self-Reported Data in the United States

Author(s)

Rascon Velasco V1, Berliner E2, Jaffe DH3, Beckwith SM4, Furegato M5, Brignoli L1
1Oracle Life Sciences, Paris, 75, France, 2Oracle Life Sciences, Kansas City, MO, USA, 3Oracle Life Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel, Israel, 4Oracle Life Sciences, Austin, TX, USA, 5Oracle Life Sciences, Paris, France

BACKGROUND: Race and ethnicity are strongly related to health status, healthcare access, and quality of care; however, they tend to be inadequately reported in Electronic Health Records (EHRs).

OBJECTIVES: To contrast race and ethnicity data reported in Oracle EHR Real-World Data (OERWD) with a US self-reported survey.

METHODS: Data from OERWD, a de-identified, HIPAA-compliant dataset from 139 US health systems (<2023, n=105,832,841) was linked to data from the US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) (2015-2022, n=292,391), a nationally-representative, self-reported, cross-sectional online survey. Individuals with invalid or inconsistent data for birth, encounter dates, race, or ethnicity within each dataset were removed. Race was categorized as American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Black/African American, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, White, Other, and Unknown. A Mixed category was added if multiple races were selected in NHWS. Ethnicity was reported as Non-Hispanic, Hispanic/Latino, and Unknown. Descriptive statistics were derived.

RESULTS: We identified 29,992 individuals, 64.7% were women with an overall mean age at last encounter of 46.2 years (SD=19.6). For race, 72.3% (n=21,683) of patients had concordant responses in both datasets, 9.5% (n=2,852) were discordant, and 18.2% (n=5,457) were Unknown in OERWD. The highest proportions of matched responses were observed among patients identifying as White (78.6%), Black/African American (74.0%) and Asian (51.1%). For all races, except Asian and White, when answers were discordant, most individuals were considered White in OERWD. Regarding ethnicity, 58.0% (n=17,396) of patients had concordant answers, 8.2% (n=2,470) were discordant, and 33.8% (n=10,126) were Unknown in OERWD. The proportion of matching answers increased with age at last encounter from 46.4% (0-14) to 86.0% (75+) for race and 10.3% to 81.5% for ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed adequate concordance between EHR-recorded race and ethnicity and self-reported data indicating reliability of these variables when reported in EHR. Further research is needed to better understand reasons for underreporting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

SA77

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Electronic Medical & Health Records, Public Health

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×