Cost-Effectiveness of Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine in Unfit Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia in China

Author(s)

Wu Y1, Xu H2, Zhao X1, Hong G1, Liu J3, Yang Y4
1Real World Solutions, IQVIA China, Shanghai, China, 2Real World Solutions, IQVIA China, Shanghai , China, 3Real World Solutions, IQVIA China, Beijing, China, 4Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive, fast-growing hematological cancer with associated infection, anemia, and bleeding. Due to the limited efficacy of current treatment, the five-year survival rate of AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (“unfit”) is only 5%. Venetoclax has demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in this group of patients. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (Ven+AZA) versus azacitidine (AZA) for patients newly diagnosed with unfit AML, from the healthcare perspective in China.

METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model (event-free survival(EFS), progressive/relapsed, and death) was developed, in which composite complete remission(CR/CRi) was further introduced as a substate of EFS to reflect the clinical reality. Based on findings from real-world studies and guidelines in China, the baseline age was set at 60 years old. A 15-year time horizon was used to balance the long-term uncertainty of model stimulation and capturing most disease progression. Clinical inputs were obtained from VIALE-A trial Asian group (e.g., CR/CRi Ven+AZA 70.49% vs. AZA 28.13%) to better represent the efficacy in Chinese population. Cost inputs were informed by public prices and literature review. Utility inputs were derived from EQ-5D-5L data in VIALE-A using Chinese tariff. Sensitivity analyses were also performed.

RESULTS: Over a 15-year horizon, Ven+AZA resulted in 1.7 QALYs gained compared to AZA, which was driven by its improved CR/CRi and survival in Asian population (even numerically superior to the ones in overall population). Meanwhile, Ven+AZA could notably save the costs of blood transfusions, anti-infective therapy, ICU rescue and palliative care. The ICER result was 20,564 CNY/QALY, which is only a quarter of the willingness-to-pay threshold of 1 times GDP per capita in China in 2023. Sensitivity analyses results demonstrated the robustness

CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that Ven+AZA is a cost-effective regimen for newly diagnosed unfit AML patients in China.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

EE411

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×