Systemic Therapy Eligibility Criteria of the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) May Reduce Undertreatment of PsO Patients with Low Body Surface Area Involvement Associated with High Disease Burden

Author(s)

Litvintchouk A, Zhao J, Adejoro O
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Horsham, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Measures of psoriasis (PsO) based on extent of skin manifestations (e.g., body surface area (BSA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]) are used for therapeutic and reimbursement decisions for systemic therapies. Patients with moderate-severe disease are typically eligible for systemic therapies per label. We sought to understand whether 2020 International Psoriasis Council (IPC) criteria for disease severity and eligibility for systemic therapy would identify patients with low BSA associated with significant disease burden or worse outcomes.

METHODS: Data from the Adelphi Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme, a point-in-time study of physicians and adult PsO patients in the US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK between 2018-2019 were queried. Physicians during routine care categorized patients as having mild, moderate, or severe PsO; the latter two were combined into a single moderate-severe category (eligible for systemic therapy per label). Additionally, PsO was retrospectively classified dichotomously based on eligibility for systemic therapy according to IPC criteria of: BSA ≥10%; plaque in sensitive areas; or failed control with topical therapy. Agreement regarding eligibility for systemic therapy between physician assessments and IPC criteria was assessed.

RESULTS: Of 3,866 cases reviewed, agreement between physician assessed and IPC criteria-based eligibility for systemic therapy was limited (55%, kappa: 0.17; p<0.0001). Patients with physician-assessed mild PsO but eligible for systemic therapy (by IPC criteria) had worse outcomes than those with mild PsO who were ineligible for systemic therapy, but better outcomes than severe PsO patients eligible for systemic therapy based on remission rates (58%, 79%, and 8%, respectively) and treatment satisfaction (90%, 99%, and 42%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: IPC criteria may more effectively identify patients eligible for systemic treatment based on PsO burden than physician assessments, and if adopted in clinical trials, clinical practice and reimbursement decisions may help reduce undertreatment of PsO.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

CO91

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Health Policy & Regulatory, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin), Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×