Economic Burden Associated With Sobriety Restrictions to Direct-Acting Antiviral Access Among Medicaid Patients With Hepatitis C Virus: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims from States With and Without Restrictions

Author(s)

Martin MT1, Rajagopalan K2, Makhija D3, Turkistani F2, Burk C3, Rock M3, Reau N4
1University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA, 2Anlitiks, Inc., Windermere, FL, USA, 3Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA, 4Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES: Delaying access to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can increase the risk of liver-related complications and medical costs. We examined economic burden associated with sobriety restrictions (SR) for DAA access among Medicaid patients with HCV.

METHODS: We used the Anlitiks All Payor Claims data, an open-source data representing all state Medicaids (January 2020-June 2022). Patients initiating DAAs (i.e., index date) between January-December 2021 were categorized based on their “state of residence” on index date into States with no sobriety restrictions (S/no-SR) and States with sobriety restrictions (S/SR). All-cause and disease specific costs were examined among patients with ≥12 months pre-index, ≥6 months post-index, and continuous medical enrollment (i.e., ≥1 medical claim) during follow-up. We compared all-cause per-patient per month (PPPM) medical cost (e.g., inpatient, outpatient, ER, and office) and all-cause PPPM pharmacy costs between S/no-SR vs. S/SR.

RESULTS: Among patients in S/no-SR cohort (n=4,623), mean age was 43.0 (SD=11.51) years, 58.1% (n=2,686) male, and 59.68% (n=2,759) with substance use history. Among the S/SR cohort (n=2,295), mean age was 45.0 (SD=12.02) years, 50.28% (n=1,154) male, and 44.1% (n=1,012) with substance use history. PPPM all-cause medical costs were significantly lower (p<0.05) for S/no-SR vs. S/SR cohort for: inpatient [$3,441.04 vs. $5,680.10], outpatient [$42.66 vs. $83.60], ER [$97.86 vs. $155.73], and office [$65.74 vs. $80.11] visits. All-cause total medical PPPM costs for S/no-SR vs S/SR patients were $753.70 vs. $1,419.31 (p<0.05), HCV-specific cost patterns were similar. All-cause PPPM pharmacy cost was also significantly lower (p<0.05) for S/no-SR ($7,309.66) vs S/SR ($9,150.81).

CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, patients initiating DAAs in S/no-SR had nearly 20% and 50% lower PPPM pharmacy and medical costs, respectively; lower medical costs driven by 40% fewer inpatient visits. Findings suggest that SR may increase medical costs potentially due to adverse long-term patient outcomes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

RWD48

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Policy & Regulatory, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Public Health, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Drugs, Gastrointestinal Disorders, Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×